2
$\begingroup$

I have the following model: ln(y) = b0 + B1 X1 + B2 ln(X2) + B3 X3

My X1 is a dummy that can take the values 0, 1 and 2.

The coefficient for the dummy 1 is -0.500.

My question is how do I interpret this? Does it mean that Y will be reduced by approximately 50% by changing the dummy variable to 1 instead of 0? And how can I calculate the exact effect on Y and not just an approximation?

All the best,

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ There are two papers on the topic which may help: Halvorsen, R. and Palmquist, P., "The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations", American Economic Review, Vol. 70, 1980, pp. 474-475. Kennedy, P., "Estimation with Correctly Interpreted Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations", American Economic Review, Vol. 71, 1981, p. 801. Also check out the formula to interpret beta in this website: econometrics.com/intro/dumlog.htm $\endgroup$
    – Ana
    Jul 27 '20 at 23:09
  • $\begingroup$ Is it a dummy or a multivalued discrete (or possibly continuous) variable? I'm curious because you noted it takes on the values 0, 1, and 2. I'm sure it was a minor oversight. $\endgroup$ Jul 28 '20 at 1:38
3
$\begingroup$

It means the logarithm of $Y$ will be -0.5 higher according to the model, which means that the actual value of $y$ will be multiplied by $\exp(-0.5) \approx 0.6$, corresponding to a 40% decrease.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot. So for small changes, say if the coefficient was -0,05 it would be and approximately 5% decrease in Y. Is that correct? $\endgroup$
    – maS
    Apr 30 '19 at 11:38
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, for small numbers it works that way. But the exact calculation is $\exp(-0.05)\approx 0.95$. $\endgroup$
    – Gijs
    Apr 30 '19 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ Now assume that we are in the same set up, that is: "I have the following model: ln(y) = b0 + B1 X1 + B2 ln(X2) + B3 X3 My X1 is a dummy that can take the values 0, 1 and 2. The coefficient for the dummy 1 is -0.500." Now think that the dummy 2 is 0.30. How to interpret that is it the same formula that we should use for finding the effect of 'switching from 0 to 2'? $\endgroup$
    – Cenk
    Jun 28 '21 at 17:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.