2
$\begingroup$

Suppose we use MCMC to estimate:

$$ \mathbf{E}_\pi (h) \approx \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N} h(X_i) $$

If a Markov chain is geometrically ergodic and there is some $ \delta > 0 $ such that $ \mathbf{E}_\pi( |h|^{2+\delta}) < \infty $, then the CLT applies and we can compute the standard error.

What if the CLT does not apply? Is it still possible to compute the standard error of the MCMC estimate? And if so, how?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ What circumstances are you envisioning that would lead to the CLT not applying? It makes a difference... $\endgroup$
    – jbowman
    Commented Nov 16, 2019 at 18:49
  • $\begingroup$ It's more of a theoretical question. For example if we are doing random walk Metropolis and have a $ \pi $ with polynomial tails then the chain will not be geometrically ergodic. However, we would still like to calculate a standard error. $\endgroup$
    – Astro Boy
    Commented Nov 16, 2019 at 20:11
  • $\begingroup$ @AstroBoy Just a small point, the CLT also holds for polynomially ergodic Markov chains arxiv.org/abs/math/0409112 $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 19, 2019 at 4:34

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Let $$ \hat{\mu}_h:= \dfrac{1}{N} \sum_{t=1}^{N} h(X_t)\,. $$

Suppose a CLT does not hold for $\hat{\mu}_h$. In order to estimate the standard error, it must be finite. That is, even though a CLT does not hold $$ \sigma^2_h:=\lim_{N \to \infty} N\text{Var}_{\pi}(\hat{\mu}_h) < \infty. $$

As long as we are willing to assume $\sigma^2_h < \infty$, then by Kipnis and Vardhan(1986), Theorem 1.1, for reversible Markov chains $$ \dfrac{1}{\sigma^2_h \sqrt{N}} (N \hat{\mu}_g - \mu) \overset{d}{\to} N(0, 1)\,. $$

In order to construct confidence intervals etc, $\sigma^2_h$ must be estimated, and in order to ensure normality in the limit, a consistent estimator of $\sigma^2_h$ is required. Unfortunately, consistency of estimators of $\sigma^2_h$ typically requires geometric or polynomial ergodicity ( Jones et. al (2006), Vats et. al. (2019) ).

Thus, in order to estimate $\sigma^2_h$ consistently, we will typically need to make these stronger assumptions on the process. However, one can used "fixed batch" estimators which are not consistent, in which case the asymptotic distribution is non-normal, but one exists. This argument can be found in detail in Atchade(2014).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.