The two objects are fundamentally different things. One extreme case to illustrate this difference is given by the kernel on $\mathbb R$
$$K(x, x') = x x' + \theta^2.$$
Samples $f \sim \mathcal{GP}(0, K)$ will be linear functions, with $f(0) \sim \mathcal N(0, \theta^2)$ and slope
\begin{align}
f(1) - f(0)
&= \begin{bmatrix}-1 & 1\end{bmatrix} \mathcal N\left( \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 0\end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix} \theta^2 & \theta^2 \\ \theta^2 & 1 + \theta^2\end{bmatrix} \right)
\\&= \mathcal N\left( \begin{bmatrix}-1 & 1\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 0\end{bmatrix}, \begin{bmatrix}-1 & 1\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \theta^2 & \theta^2 \\ \theta^2 & 1 + \theta^2\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}-1 \\ 1\end{bmatrix} \right)
\\&= \mathcal N\left( 0, \begin{bmatrix}-1 & 1\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} \right)
\\&= \mathcal N\left( 0, 1 \right)
.\end{align}
The previous post you link to discusses the random function $f'$; for this choice of kernel, $f'$ will be simply a constant function equal to the slope, which is standard normal (and totally independent of $\theta$, for this kernel).
What scikit-learn computes is, in this case, $$\frac{\partial K}{\partial \theta} = 2 \theta.$$
This is quite useful in, e.g., finding the kernel parameters which maximize the likelihood of some dataset. But in this case, it's not at all related to what you seem to want, "the derivative of the GP function at some evaluation function"; I don't think scikit-learn directly implements that.
You might be interested instead in GPflow or gpytorch. Both are modern, full-featured, actively-developed GP implementations in TensorFlow / PyTorch respectively; either should I think make it straightforward to find the derivative you're looking for.