I hope someone could help me with the following problem: If I create a linear model that predicts the height of people (y) with the following parameters:

y = a + b*(xi-xavg)

with "a" the normally distributed (178,20) the prior distribution of heights and "b" a coefficient for the effect of the weight on the height prediction. The question is if I have to choose the normal distribution or the lognormal distribution for coefficient "b". I understand that the normal distribution has the maximum entropy for a given variance (sigma = Uniform(0,50) here) so do I just pick the normal distribution here?

If anyone has some insights, thank you so much! :)


As a rule of thumb:

Normal models an additive product, LogNormal is a multiplicative product of many 'weak' influences.

Normal can be negative, LogNormal is strictly non-negative.

The first point doesn't really matter in this case. As for the second, if you used LogNormal without any additional processing, you're assuming the weight can only influence the height positively, which seems like an ungrounded and unnecessary assumption.

For example. you could argue that people with a lithe build tend to be taller, and that the impact of the added height is overshadowed by the impact of the body type.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! $\endgroup$ – Tumke Jan 27 '20 at 15:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.