# CDF of measurement vector with correlated noises

Given the following definitions:

$$X \sim \mathcal{N}(\bar{x}, \sigma_{0}^{2})$$, and $$W_i \sim \mathcal{N}(0, \sigma^{2})$$, $$i \in \{1,2\}$$ and $$E[W_1W_2]=\rho \sigma^2$$. $$X$$ and $$W_i$$ are independent.

Two measurements $$Z_1$$ and $$Z_2$$ are performed $$Z_i = X + W_i$$ What is the distribution of vector RV $$Z = [Z_1 \ Z_2]^{T}$$?

I tried to get the distribution by calculating CDF of $$Z$$

$$F_Z(z_1,z_2)=P\{Z_1 \leq z_1,Z_2 \leq z_2\} = P\{Z_1 \leq z_1 | Z_2 \leq z_2\} P\{Z_2 \leq z_2\}$$ I know how to calculate $$P\{Z_2 \leq z_2\}$$ $$Z_2 \sim \mathcal{N}(\bar{x}, \sigma_{0}^{2} + \sigma^{2})$$ I don't know how to calculate conditional probability $$P\{Z_1 \leq z_1 | Z_2 \leq z_2\}$$.

Is there different approach to find out how $$Z$$ is distributed?

• $\bar{x}$ would normally indicate a sample mean rather than a population mean (for which $\mu$ would most typically be used). It seems odd to avoid the Greek letter for the mean but to use it for the variance. Jul 26, 2020 at 23:21
• I follow the convention in the book I currently study. Yaakov & Li, X.‐Rong & Kirubarajan, Thia. (2004). Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software. My question is related to exercise from the book in which x bar was used for mean and sigma for variance. Jul 27, 2020 at 6:24
• That the book (inconsistently!) flouts convention bodes very poorly for the book (for example it hints at substantial deficits of understanding on the part of the authors, though perhaps it points to a lack of clarity of exposition instead); it doesn't make it seem any less odd. Jul 28, 2020 at 12:44
• For my question you are right, I should have used Greek letter for the expectation. In the context of state estimation. Where $x$ represents state or random process it is common to use $\bar{x}$. Jul 28, 2020 at 19:31
• It might be worth noting the choice of notation is from the book; I wouldn't change it. Jul 29, 2020 at 1:18

It seems you assume $$X$$ is independent of $$W_i$$, and $$W_i$$ are jointly normal. Following this fact, $$Z_i$$ become jointly normal, and you can use the conditional distribution formula to find the joint PDF of $$Z_i$$. A similar approach for finding the joint PDF would be directly calculating the mean and covariance vector for $$[Z_1, Z_2]$$ ($$Z$$ is jointly normal because it's a linear transform of the random vector $$[X,W_1,W_2]$$). However, multivariate normal CDF has no closed form.
• I don't want closed form solution. It is fine to show that $Z$ is Gaussian and hence cdf is known. Or express the solution with cdf of Gaussian distributions. How it follows from the fact that $Z_1$ and $Z_2$ are Gaussian that $Z$ is Gaussian? Jul 26, 2020 at 12:36
• If $W_i$ are jointly normal (so as $X$ since it's independent), by the properties of jointly normal RVs, a linear transformation on the vector $[X,W_1,W_2]$, which is $[Z_1,Z_2]$ in this case, is also a jointly normal vector. Jul 26, 2020 at 13:04
• Now I understand. I feel linear transformation argument should be added to your answer. $[X,W_1,W_2]=Y \sim \mathcal{N}(\mathbf{m}=[\bar{x} \ 0 \ 0]',P=\begin{bmatrix} \sigma_{0}^{2} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \sigma^2 & \rho \sigma^2 \\ 0 & \rho\sigma^2 & \sigma^2 \end{bmatrix})$ and $Z=BY$ where $B=\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 &0 &1\end{bmatrix}$ $\implies$ $Z \sim \mathcal{N}(B\mathbf{m},BPB')$ Jul 26, 2020 at 16:19
Addition to the previous answer. You can approximate a bivariate normal distribution with an arbitrary mean vector $${\bf \mu}$$ and covariance matrix $$\Sigma$$ by the eigen-vector transformation of the covariance matrix (see Appendix A.2 in (n-dimensional normal distribution). This yields an n-dimensional normal distribution with $${\bf \mu}\prime = (0,\ldots,0)^T$$ and the covariance matrix $$\Sigma \prime =I$$ $$\; \; -$$ the identity matrix.