I was watching this numerical problem on SVM link here. At 4.42 he wrote this equation:
$$ \begin{align} \alpha_1 \tilde{s_1} \cdot \tilde{s_1} + \alpha_2 \tilde{s_2} \cdot \tilde{s_1} + \alpha_3 \tilde{s_3} \cdot \tilde{s_1} &= -1 \\ \alpha_1 \tilde{s_1} \cdot \tilde{s_2} + \alpha_2 \tilde{s_2} \cdot \tilde{s_2} + \alpha_3 \tilde{s_3} \cdot \tilde{s_2} &= +1 \\ \alpha_1 \tilde{s_1} \cdot \tilde{s_3} + \alpha_2 \tilde{s_2} \cdot \tilde{s_3} + \alpha_3 \tilde{s_3} \cdot \tilde{s_3} &= +1 \end{align} $$
where $\tilde{s_1}, \tilde{s_2}, \tilde{s_3}$ are support vectors. But from the support vector we see that: $$ w = \sum \alpha_i y_i s_i$$ where $y_i$ is class label and $s_i$ is support vector. Since $\alpha$'s are zero for all other points except support vector so I am considering only the support vector here. My question is if we look at the above equation he just wrote: $$ w = \sum \alpha_i s_i$$
I can't understand how he wrote $ w = \sum \alpha_i s_i$ and get the correct answer yet?