2
$\begingroup$

Let $X_t$ be a causal $AR(p)$ process. Compute a linear forecast $X_{t+2}$ based on $X_1, X_2, ..., X_t$ for $t \geq p+1$.

If $AR(p)$ is causal it means that it can be rewritten as a linear process: $X_t=\sum\limits_{i=0}^{\infty}\psi_iZ_{t-i}$ where $\sum\limits_{i=0}^{\infty}|\psi_i|<\infty$ and $Z_t$ is a white noise.

My prediction should be a linear combination of $X_1,...,X_t: \hat X_{t+2}=m+\sum\limits_{i=1}^t a_iX_{i}$ so it is a projection onto space spanned by $(X_1, ..., X_n)$. But how to proceed?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Consider $X_{t+2}$ term: \begin{equation} \begin{split} X_{t+2} & = \sum_{i=1}^p \psi_iX_{t+2-i} \,+Z_{t+2} = \psi_1X_{t+1} + \sum_{i=2}^p\psi_iX_{t+2-i} \,+Z_{t+2} \\ & = \psi_1\left(\sum_{i=1}^p \psi_iX_{t+1-i} + Z_{t+1}\right) + \sum_{i=1}^{p-1}\psi_{i+1}X_{t+1-i} + Z_{t+2} \\ & = \underbrace{\psi_1\sum_{i=1}^p \psi_iX_{t+1-i}}_{\in\;sp(X_1\ldots X_t)} + \underbrace{\sum_{i=1}^{p-1}\psi_{i+1}X_{t+1-i}}_{\in\;sp(X_1\ldots X_t)} + \underbrace{\psi_1Z_{t+1} + Z_{t+2}}_{\bot\;sp(X_1\ldots X_t)}. \end{split} \end{equation} We know that $\psi_1Z_{t+1} + Z_{t+2}\;\bot\;sp(X_1\ldots X_t)$ from causality.

Hence the forecast is: \begin{equation} \begin{split} P_{\text{sp}(X_1\ldots X_t)}X_{t+2} = \psi_1\sum_{i=1}^p \psi_iX_{t+1-i} + \sum_{i=1}^{p-1}\psi_{i+1}X_{t+1-i}. \end{split} \end{equation}

If you know Mr. John Mielniczuk (as I suppose he is an author of this task), give him my regards.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

This looks like a question, so I will give you a hint:

  1. Start with $\hat X_{t+1}$ as a linear combination of $X_1,\dots,X_t$ using the definition of AR(p).
  2. Then do $\hat X_{t+2}$ as a linear combination of $X_1,\dots,X_{t+1}$ in the same way.
  3. Replace $X_{t+1}$ in the previous step with $\hat X_{t+1}$ from the first step.
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ thanks! Of course this hint is helpful and I'm glad that you didn't provide a full solution, howerver I struggle a bit while trying to obtain $\hat X_{t+1}$ - I don't really know what formula should I end up with. $\endgroup$
    – thesecond
    Commented Mar 23, 2021 at 0:26
  • $\begingroup$ @thesecond, apply the definition of AR(p) but instead of $X_t$ on the left hand side, write it for $X_{t+1}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 23, 2021 at 6:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.