5
$\begingroup$

hello I have two independent variable P and Q. They are both non-negative. Let $\alpha \in (0,1)$. Now I define two new variables on them:

The first variable is the sum of the two variables $$R_1:=\alpha P+(1-\alpha)Q.$$

The second variable R2 is the mixture of the two variables: there is a probability of $\alpha$ that we get P and $1-\alpha$ probability to get Q. Or formally, let 𝑍 be an independent, binary variable with $$𝑃(𝑍=1)=\alpha, 𝑃(𝑍=0)=1−\alpha,$$ then $$𝑅_2:=𝑍𝑃+(1−𝑍)𝑄 $$.

Here is an example. Let $P=Q=(10,0.5;0,0.5)$ which means there is 0.5 probability to get 10 and 0.5 probability to get 0. Let $\alpha=0.5$. Then $R_1=(10,0.25;5,0.5;0,0.25)$ and $R_2=(10,0.5;0,0.5)$.

From the a previous post, I understand that $$E(R_1)=E(R_2)\; and \;Var(R_1)<Var(R_2.)$$ However I wonder if we can get the stronger result that $R_1$ second order stochastic dominates $R_2$? That is for all $k \geq a$ $$\int_a^k cdf_1(t)\,dt \leq \int_a^k cdf_2(t)\,dt$$

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

We will use Theorem 4.2 in this MIT notes to prove that $R_1$ second order stochastic dominates $R_2$.

Let $F_p(\dot): \mathbb{R} \rightarrow [0,1]$ and $F_p(\dot): \mathbb{R} \rightarrow [0,1]$ denote the two cumulative distributions. Let $u(\cdot)$ denote an increasing and concave function. Denote

$$EU(R_1)=\int_a^b \int_a^b u(\alpha y+(1-\alpha)z ) dF_p(y) dF_q(z) $$ Since $u(\cdot)$ is concave, it has the property that for any $\alpha \in [0,1]$ and any $y,z$ $$ u(\alpha y+(1-\alpha)z) \geq \alpha u(y)+(1-\alpha)u(z). $$ So we have \begin{align*} EU(R_1)& \geq \int_a^b \int_a^b \alpha u(y)+ (1-\alpha)u(z)dF_p(y) dF_q(z) \\ &=\alpha \int_a^b \int_a^b u(y)dF_p(y) dF_q(z)+ (1-\alpha) \int_a^b \int_a^b u(z)dF_p(y) dF_q(z) \\ &=\alpha \int_a^b \left( \int_a^b u(y)dF_p(y) \right ) dF_q(z)+ (1-\alpha) \int_a^b \left( \int_a^b u(z) dF_q(z) \right ) dF_p(y) \\ &=\alpha \int_a^b E(u(P)) dF_q(z)+ (1-\alpha) \int_a^b E(u(Q)) dF_p(y) \\ &=\alpha E(u(P)) \int_a^b dF_q(z)+ (1-\alpha) E(u(Q))\int_a^b dF_p(y) \\ &=\alpha E(u(P))+ (1-\alpha)E(u(Q)) \end{align*}

Denote $$EU(R_2)=\alpha E(u(P))+ (1-\alpha)EU(u(Q))$$ so we have $$ EU(R_1) \geq EU(R_2).$$

Note we also have $$ E(R_1)=E(R_2).$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.