Suppose that I have a random variable $X$, which is a variable-dimensional (i.e. it could be 1 dimensional, 2 dimensional, 3 dimensional, etc.). The dimension of a specific $x$ is known and denoted as $d(x)$. The distribution of $X$ can be discrete, continuous, or mixed, and I use the measure $\mathbb P_X$ to refer to it.

Now, I am interested in the indexed entry $Y=(X, I)$, where $1\leq I \leq d(X)$. In other words, each $Y$ is a joint vector containing the full vector $X$ and an index $I$. Suppose I know that all the $Y$s corresponding to the same $X$ have uniform distribution (i.e. with probability $1/d(X)$). Thus, I can sample $Y$ from the following procedure:

  1. $X\sim \mathbb P_X$
  2. $I\sim \mathrm{Unif}(\{1, ..., d(X)\})$
  3. $Y=(X, I)$

What is the formal way of writing down the general probability measure notation for $Y$? Specifically, I want to express $\mathbb P_Y = ?$. The tricky part is that whether $Y$ is continuous or discrete depends on that of $X$, and ideally I want a unified notation to cover both cases (and the case of hybrid distribution). I am thinking about something like $\mathbb P_Y=\frac{1}{d(X)}\mathbb P_X$, but this doesn't seem correct as it has an "undefined" variable $X$ and I don't even think I can divide a probability measure by something.

  • $\begingroup$ At the moment your value $Y=(X,I)$ is not just a specific entry of $X$ --- it is the joint vector containing $X$ and also a random index value. Do you perhaps intend to have $Y=X_I$ instead, or is your description of this variable wrong? $\endgroup$
    – Ben
    Aug 23, 2021 at 6:22
  • $\begingroup$ @Ben Oh sorry for the confusion. I did intend it to be $Y=(X, I)$, which is the joint distribution of $X$ and a random index value of it. $\endgroup$
    – Y.Z.
    Aug 23, 2021 at 23:35
  • $\begingroup$ Okay; in view of that I have made an edit to reword your description of $Y$. Please check that this accords with your understanding of the question. $\endgroup$
    – Ben
    Aug 24, 2021 at 1:21

1 Answer 1


In order to stress that some of your objects are vectors, I am going to call them $\mathbf{Y}$ and $\mathbf{X}$ in bold notation.

We usually don't try to write probability measures explicitly, since they are functions defined on a sigma-field, and this makes them cumbersome to write in explicit form. When we want to set out explicit results for a situation where we may have discrete or continuous (or mixed) random variables, we usually do this using the cumulative distribution function.

Simplifying the distribution: In your case, the main challenge here is dealing with a random vector with variable dimension. A simple and effective way to deal with this is to define this random vector using two parts: a sequence giving all elements when the dimension is infinite; and a random variable determining the actual dimension. To do this, suppose we define a random sequence $\mathbf{X}_\infty = (X_1,X_2,X_3,...)$, a random dimension $D$ and a random index $I$ and we then define:

$$\begin{align} \mathbf{X} &\equiv (X_1,...,X_D), \\[6pt] \mathbf{Y} &\equiv (X_1,...,X_D,I). \\[6pt] \end{align}$$

The random object $(\mathbf{X}_\infty, D)$ fully determines $\mathbf{X}$ and the random object $(\mathbf{X}_\infty, D, I)$ fully determines $\mathbf{Y}$. We can characterise the distribution of interest by noting the conditional independence $I \ \bot \ \mathbf{X}_\infty | D$ and then decomposing it into the following parts:

$$\begin{align} p(d) &\equiv \mathbb{P}(D=d), \\[10pt] p_d(i) &\equiv \mathbb{P}(I=i |D=d) = \frac{\mathbb{I}(i \in \{1,...,d\})}{d}, \\[12pt] F_d(\mathbf{x}_\infty) &\equiv \mathbb{P}(\mathbf{X}_\infty \leqslant \mathbf{x}_\infty|D=d). \\[6pt] \end{align}$$

This gives us some structure that makes it simpler to write the joint distribution of interest, leading to the probability measure of interest.

Writing the distribution of interest: Now, let $\mathbf{y} = (\mathbf{x}, i) = (x_1,...,x_d, i)$ denote a specific value for the outcome $\mathbf{Y}$. Regardless of whether the values in $\mathbf{X}_\infty$ are discrete or continuous (or mixed) we can encompass all information of interest using the following function:

$$\begin{align} H_\mathbf{Y}(\mathbf{y}) &\equiv \mathbb{P}(\mathbf{X} \leqslant \mathbf{x}, I = i) \\[6pt] &= \mathbb{P}(\mathbf{X} \leqslant \mathbf{x}, I = i, D = d) \\[6pt] &= \mathbb{P}(\mathbf{X} \leqslant \mathbf{x}| I = i, D = d) \cdot p_d(i) \cdot p(d) \\[6pt] &= F_d((\mathbf{x},\infty,\infty,\infty,...)) \cdot p_d(i) \cdot p(d). \\[6pt] \end{align}$$

This function is a mixture of a CDF (with respect to $\mathbf{X}$) and a mass function (with respect to $I$). It uniquely determines the probability measure $\mathbb{P}_\mathbf{Y}$. Specifically, this function allows you to define the pre-measure:

$$\mathbb{P}_\mathbf{Y}((-\infty, \mathbf{x}] \times (-\infty,i]) = \sum_{j=1}^{\lfloor i \rfloor} H_\mathbf{Y}((\mathbf{x},j)),$$

and the full probability measure is then uniquely defined using the Carathéodory extension theorem.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.