0
$\begingroup$

I know this is quite basic, but I fail to see where my mistake with the following simple example from wikipedia is.

\begin{align*} G(y) &= \Pr(Y \leq y) \\ &= \Pr \left (X \geq \frac{1}{y} \right) \\ &= 1 - \Pr\left(X < \frac{1}{y} \right) \\ &= 1 - F\left(\frac{1}{y} \right) \end{align*}

What I don't understand is, why does first CDF, i.e. $G(y) = \Pr(Y \leq y)$, say "smaller or equal", while the second CDF, i.e. $F\left(\frac{1}{y} \right)= \Pr\left(X < \frac{1}{y} \right)$, says "strictly smaller"?

Shouldn't they both have the same definition, i.e. "smaller or equal", as they're both just a normal CDF? Can you please explain to me what I'm missing?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It is assumed that $X$ is a continuous random variable with a density and so $\Pr(X=x) = 0$ for all $x$. It follows that $\Pr\left(X < \frac{1}{y} \right) = \Pr\left(X \leq \frac{1}{y} \right) = F\left(\frac{1}{y} \right)$ $\endgroup$
    – periwinkle
    Commented Oct 29, 2021 at 14:15
  • $\begingroup$ I see, thanks a lot, that makes a lot of sense! $\endgroup$
    – futur3boy
    Commented Oct 29, 2021 at 14:20

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You have

$$ \Pr\Big(X \ge \frac{1}{y} \Big) = 1 - \Pr\Big(X < \frac{1}{y} \Big) $$

it would be contradictory if you had "$=$" on both sides of the equation. Moreover, as noticed in the comment, for continuous random variable $\Pr(X = x) = 0$ so it doesn't really matter.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.