1
$\begingroup$

I am new to Monte Carlo simulation and have a question. What is the connection between the standard errors of the estimates that we normally get from a regression and standard deviation of sampling distribution for the same parameter that we get from MC simulation. I notice that the mean of these two over several repetitions are very close. Conceptually I can understand that they should be close but still I am not quite clear about it! and what do we understand if these two values are not close? Is there any theoretical proof to show the connection between these two? Any clarification is much appreciated.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ The standard error of an estimate is by definition the population standard deviation of its sampling distribution, which you can (naturally) estimate by sampling it. $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Commented Nov 25, 2021 at 15:39

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

This is a great question. If we conceptualize repeating the experiment an infinite number of times then there is a one true standard error that we will never know. The standard error estimate produced my most regression packages replaces unknown parameters with estimates of these parameters. When you perform a simulation you can capture the estimated standard error in each simulated run and then plot these using a histogram. This shows the sampling variability of the standard error estimator. You can compare these standard error estimates to the Monte Carlo standard error. The Monte Carlo standard error can be brought arbitrarily close to the one true standard error with enough simulated runs.

In non-normal models the Wald, score, and likelihood ratio tests treat the estimated standard error as known (as if it is the one true standard error). In a normal model the t- and F- tests are special in that they account for the sampling variability of the standard error estimator.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Geoffrey for your response. Do you know what are the possible reasons if these two values (ie. MC standard deviations and mean of standard errors of estimates) are not the same, other than the number of MC repetitions? What could I understand from this difference? $\endgroup$
    – Eva
    Commented Nov 25, 2021 at 19:57
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Eva, the MC standard deviations (standard error), with enough repetitions, is essentially the true standard error under the simulation scenario. In practice we cannot actually repeat our experiment a near-infinite number of times and we do not know the true underlying parameters so we can at best estimate or approximate the true standard error. It is analogous to $\bar{x}$ vs $\mu$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 25, 2021 at 23:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.