Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with false-discovery-rate
Search options not deleted
user 107646
An expected fraction of rejected null hypotheses that are falsely rejected, i.e. the fraction of significant findings that are actually not true. One method to control FDR in multiple testing is Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
6
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Is it fair to use FDR when the p-value distribution is not uniform under null hypothesis?
One post says that we should check the distribution of p-value before apply FDR correction. If the p-value distribution doesn't behavior well(e.g. U shape, not uniformly distributed at the tail toward …
- 75