Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with bugs
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 1381
BUGS is an acronym for Bayesian inference Using Gibbs Sampling; BUGS is also a software package for doing this. Use for all versions of BUGS, also WINBUGS and OpenBUGS.
7
votes
1
answer
6k
views
How do I parameterize a Weibull distribution in JAGS / BUGS?
Based on the answer to a previous question, For which distributions are the parameterizations in BUGS and R different? …
- 7,270
10
votes
2
answers
3k
views
How can I generate a plot similar to that produced by plot.bugs and plot.jags from an mcmc.l... [closed]
R seems to be able to output nice summary plots from the bugs and jags objects generated by the functions R2WinBUGS::bugs and R2jags:jags.
However, I am using the rjags package. … The problem is that plot.bugs takes a bugs object as an argument, while plot.mcmc.list takes the output of coda.samples. …
- 7,270
32
votes
1
answer
7k
views
For which distributions are the parameterizations in BUGS and R different?
##'
##' R and BUGS have different parameterizations for some distributions.
##' This function transforms the distributions from R defaults to BUGS
##' defaults. … BUGS is an implementation of the BUGS language, and these
##' transformations are expected to work for bugs.
##' @param priors data.frame with colnames c('distn', 'parama', 'paramb')
##' @return priors …
- 7,270