Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with interpretation
Search options not deleted
user 166344
Refers generally to making substantive conclusions from the results of a statistical analysis.
1
vote
1
answer
817
views
How do the random effects relate to the fixed effects in the output from a mixed model?
When I run my output from the lmer function for random effects, I get something like this:
form_lmer1 <- "y ~ 1 + Var1 + (1+Var1 | group)"
fm3 <- lmer(as.formula(form_lmer1), df, REML=FALS …
- 163