Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with anova
Search options not deleted
user 204636
ANOVA stands for ANalysis Of VAriance, a statistical model and set of procedures for comparing multiple group means. The independent variables in an ANOVA model are categorical, but an ANOVA table can be used to test continuous variables as well.
2
votes
1
answer
641
views
ANOVA - significant main effect, no significant interaction. What to do next? planned compar...
I conducted a two-way ANOVA, with perceived diagnosticity, i.e. the ability to evaluate haptic properties of a product, as the dependent variable and sound manipulation (congruent, incongruent and no-sound … The results are as follows:
Anova Table (Type III tests)
Response: PD
Sum Sq Df F value Pr(>F)
(Intercept) 2056.20 1 784.8304 < 2.2e-16 ***
Manipulation …
- 309
1
vote
1
answer
600
views
two-way ANOVA - how to conduct post-hoc tests?
Conducted a two-way ANOVA and got a main effect of sound manipulation onto perceived diagnosticity. … Anova Table (Type III tests)
Response: PD
Sum Sq Df F value Pr(>F)
(Intercept) 2056.20 1 784.8304 < 2.2e-16 ***
Manipulation 40.70 2 7.7668 0.0006036 …
- 309
7
votes
1
answer
12k
views
Why do planned comparisons and post-hoc tests differ?
I conducted a three-way independent ANOVA. I manipulated the sound of my stimulus to be 1: congruent (KON), 2: incongruent (INK) and 3: no sound at all (control condition). …
- 309