Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with post-hoc
Search options not deleted
user 204636
"post-hoc" refers to analyses that are decided upon after the data has been collected, as opposed to "a priori".
2
votes
1
answer
641
views
ANOVA - significant main effect, no significant interaction. What to do next? planned compar...
I conducted a two-way ANOVA, with perceived diagnosticity, i.e. the ability to evaluate haptic properties of a product, as the dependent variable and sound manipulation (congruent, incongruent and no- …
- 309
1
vote
1
answer
600
views
two-way ANOVA - how to conduct post-hoc tests?
Conducted a two-way ANOVA and got a main effect of sound manipulation onto perceived diagnosticity.
Anova Table (Type III tests)
Response: PD
Sum Sq Df F value Pr(>F) …
- 309
7
votes
1
answer
12k
views
Why do planned comparisons and post-hoc tests differ?
I conducted a three-way independent ANOVA. I manipulated the sound of my stimulus to be 1: congruent (KON), 2: incongruent (INK) and 3: no sound at all (control condition). One of my planned compariso …
- 309