Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with post-hoc
Search options not deleted
user 217618
"post-hoc" refers to analyses that are decided upon after the data has been collected, as opposed to "a priori".
0
votes
0
answers
63
views
R: Interpreting the emmeans' t-tests [duplicate]
Since the df are different between t-tests and emmeans ones (cf. https://stats.stackexchange.com/a/369671/217618), how then should I interpreted the results?
- 23