Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with medicine
Search options not deleted
user 238499
3
votes
Accepted
Is this test muddying the water?
"This means their pre-test probability was around 85%. This is higher than their post-test probability on a positive test"
If this statement is true, then yes, the test in question is worthless. Stil …
- 2,665
0
votes
Percentage change
Yes. You are probably overthinking it, although there could be some subtleties
Average percent change: Calculate the percent change for each individual, then average the results. This is probably wha …
- 2,665