Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with r
Search options not deleted
user 9125
Use this tag for any *on-topic* question that (a) involves `R` either as a critical part of the question or expected answer, & (b) is not *just* about how to use `R`.
11
votes
1
answer
23k
views
VIF for generalized linear model
: 0.8553, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8544
F-statistic: 977.1 on 3 and 496 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
> summary(fit.lm.test)
Call:
lm(formula = X4 ~ X1 + X2 + X3, data = test)
Residuals:
Min … : 0.8806, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8799
F-statistic: 1219 on 3 and 496 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16
>
> car::vif(fit.lm)
X1 X2 X3
6.260418 6.329868 6.480232
> car::vif(fit.lm.test) …
- 607
3
votes
1
answer
3k
views
Can one do GLM with LOESS transformed variables
I am considering to do a transformation to the parameters like a loess function in R. Loess applies to linear models where dependent variable is continuous, but my dependent variable is binary. …
- 607