Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with statistical-significance
Search options not deleted
user 99016
Statistical significance is a characteristic of a statistic viewed in light of a null hypothesis and a given significance level. It reflects whether the statistic belongs to the rejection region (is statistically significant) or the acceptance region (is not statistically significant).
2
votes
Accepted
Statistical methods for analyzing results of preference study
Right, I'd treat this as a multilevel logistic regression. Formally:
$y_{ijk} = \beta_0 + \beta_1V_{ijk} + \alpha_i^p + \alpha_i^{p*v}V_{ijk} + \alpha_j^s + \alpha_j^{s*v}V_{ijk} + \alpha_{ij}^{p*s*v …
- 480
2
votes
ANOVA: Non-significant main effect with significant post-hoc test?
You can report it just that way - the omnibus was not significant, but post-hoc tests were. Although I think orthodoxy is that one wouldn't run the post-hoc tests if the omnibus was not significant un …
- 480