Skip to main content
added 13 characters in body
Source Link
Ferdi
  • 5.3k
  • 10
  • 47
  • 64

There are different kinds of MCMC algorithms: Metropolis-Hastings, Gibbs, importance/rejection sampling (related).

  • Metropolis-Hastings
  • Gibbs
  • Importance/rejection sampling (related).

Why would one use Gibbs sampling instead of Metropolis-Hastings? I suspect there are cases when inference is more tractable with Gibbs sampling than with Metropolis-Hastings, but I am not clear on the specifics.

There are different kinds of MCMC algorithms: Metropolis-Hastings, Gibbs, importance/rejection sampling (related).

Why would one use Gibbs sampling instead of Metropolis-Hastings? I suspect there are cases when inference is more tractable with Gibbs sampling than with Metropolis-Hastings, but I am not clear on the specifics.

There are different kinds of MCMC algorithms:

  • Metropolis-Hastings
  • Gibbs
  • Importance/rejection sampling (related).

Why would one use Gibbs sampling instead of Metropolis-Hastings? I suspect there are cases when inference is more tractable with Gibbs sampling than with Metropolis-Hastings, but I am not clear on the specifics.

deleted 38 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Xi'an
  • 107.7k
  • 13
  • 190
  • 676

When would someoneone use Gibbs sampling instead of Metropolis-Hastings?

There are several different kinds of MCMC algorithms: Metropolis-Hastings, Gibbs, importance/rejection sampling (related).

Why would someone go withone use Gibbs sampling instead of Metropolis-Hastings? I suspect there are cases when inference is more tractable with Gibbs sampling than with Metropolis-Hastings, but I am not clear on the specifics. Any help appreciated.

When would someone use Gibbs sampling instead of Metropolis-Hastings?

There are several different kinds of MCMC algorithms: Metropolis-Hastings, Gibbs, importance/rejection sampling (related).

Why would someone go with Gibbs sampling instead of Metropolis-Hastings? I suspect there are cases when inference is more tractable with Gibbs sampling than with Metropolis-Hastings, but I am not clear on the specifics. Any help appreciated.

When would one use Gibbs sampling instead of Metropolis-Hastings?

There are different kinds of MCMC algorithms: Metropolis-Hastings, Gibbs, importance/rejection sampling (related).

Why would one use Gibbs sampling instead of Metropolis-Hastings? I suspect there are cases when inference is more tractable with Gibbs sampling than with Metropolis-Hastings, but I am not clear on the specifics.

Tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/796032472135909376
edited tags
Link
Franck Dernoncourt
  • 47.6k
  • 33
  • 179
  • 293
Source Link
ShanZhengYang
  • 703
  • 1
  • 6
  • 14
Loading