Skip to main content
fixed typos
Source Link
Scortchi
  • 31.6k
  • 9
  • 102
  • 282

I don't understand three important issues :

(1) Why do we calculate the test statistic under the null hypothesis ?

(2) Why do we reject the null hypothesis when :

p-value < significance level ?

(3) Why is type-I error is more serious than type-II error ?

I don't understand three important issues :

(1) Why do we calculate the test statistic under the null hypothesis ?

(2) Why we reject the null hypothesis when :

p-value < significance level ?

(3) Why type-I error is more serious than type-II error ?

I don't understand three important issues :

(1) Why do we calculate the test statistic under the null hypothesis ?

(2) Why do we reject the null hypothesis when :

p-value < significance level ?

(3) Why is type-I error more serious than type-II error ?

small typos
Source Link
Alecos Papadopoulos
  • 60.8k
  • 8
  • 154
  • 278

Three important issueissues

I don't understand three important issueissues :

(1) Why do we calculate the test statistic under the null hypothesis ?

(2) Why we reject null the null hypothesis when :

p-value < significance level ?

(3) Why type-I error is more serious than type-II error ?

Three important issue

I don't understand three important issue :

(1) Why we calculate test statistic under null hypothesis ?

(2) Why we reject null hypothesis when :

p-value < significance level ?

(3) Why type-I error is more serious than type-II error ?

Three important issues

I don't understand three important issues :

(1) Why do we calculate the test statistic under the null hypothesis ?

(2) Why we reject the null hypothesis when :

p-value < significance level ?

(3) Why type-I error is more serious than type-II error ?

Source Link
user 31466
  • 1.4k
  • 2
  • 16
  • 34

Three important issue

I don't understand three important issue :

(1) Why we calculate test statistic under null hypothesis ?

(2) Why we reject null hypothesis when :

p-value < significance level ?

(3) Why type-I error is more serious than type-II error ?