0
$\begingroup$

Let $X_1, X_2,\dots,X_n$ be a random sample from a distribution with pdf $\frac{1}{\sigma} e^{-\frac{(x − \mu)}{\sigma}}$ for $x > \mu$, where $\mu$ and $\sigma$ are both unknown, $-∞ < μ < ∞$, $0 < σ < ∞$; and $n ≥ 2$. Derive the ML estimators for $μ/ σ$ and $μ + σ$.

I am able to find the maximum likelihood estimator for $μ$ and $σ$ which is ML for $μ = X(1)$ (smallest order statistics) and ML for $σ = (X_i – X(1) )/n$. What does ML for $μ/σ$ mean? should we have to calculate ML for $μ$ and $σ$ separately? Help will be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Can you clarify here: 1/σ*exp[-(x − μ)/ σ] x > μ? Why do you have an inequality in your pdf? $\endgroup$
    – dlnB
    Commented Apr 20, 2020 at 19:24
  • $\begingroup$ The acutal pdf function is pdf 1/σ*exp[-(x − μ)/ σ], given x > μ. sorry i am do not have any idea more than this $\endgroup$
    – DglPr
    Commented Apr 20, 2020 at 19:31
  • $\begingroup$ I already edited your post. Try tu use LaTeX for your math expressions next time. $\endgroup$
    – Oriol B
    Commented Apr 20, 2020 at 19:32
  • $\begingroup$ Appreciated. I am the novice user $\endgroup$
    – DglPr
    Commented Apr 20, 2020 at 19:34
  • $\begingroup$ Search for 'invariance property' of MLE. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 20, 2020 at 20:10

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Actually your log-likelihood is

$$ \ell(\mu,\sigma)=-n\log \sigma - \frac{1}{\sigma}\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu) $$

so the MLE of $\sigma$ is $\hat{\sigma} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)$. By equivariance of the MLE, $\hat{\sigma} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \hat{\mu})$. In fact what you have is a shifted Exponential distribution, so once you shift it again, you recover the MLE of the $\lambda$ parameter of $Exp\left(\frac{1}{\lambda}\right)$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I could not understand you last line. Could you please elaborate it? $\endgroup$
    – DglPr
    Commented Apr 20, 2020 at 20:01
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know what part of the last line you are referring to, so I'll walk through. I found the MLE by simply maximising the $\ell$ with respect to $\sigma$. Equivariance states that if $g:\Theta \to \Theta'$ is a bijection and $\hat{\theta}$ is the MLE of $\theta$, then $g(\hat{\theta})$ is the MLE of $\theta$. Finally I say that your problem is easier by noting that $Z:=X-\mu$ has a distribution $Z\sim Exp\left(\frac{1}{\sigma}\right)$ and the MLE of $\sigma$ (or $\lambda$ in the usual notation) is well-known. $\endgroup$
    – Oriol B
    Commented Apr 22, 2020 at 10:20
  • $\begingroup$ .Thank you for clarification. $\endgroup$
    – DglPr
    Commented Apr 27, 2020 at 13:14
1
$\begingroup$

\begin{align} L(\mu,\sigma) & = \prod_{i=1}^n \left( \frac 1 \sigma e^{-(x_i-\mu)/\sigma} \right) \\[8pt] & = \frac 1 {\sigma^n} e^{-\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i-\mu)/\sigma}. \end{align} As $\mu$ increases, $L(\mu,\sigma)$ increases until $\mu$ gets as big as $\min\{x_1,\ldots,x_n\}.$ Therefore the MLE of $\mu$ is $\min\{x_1,\ldots,x_n\}.$ So we have \begin{align} L(\min,\sigma) & = \frac 1 {\sigma^n} e^{-\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \min)/\sigma} \\[8pt] \ell(\min,\sigma) = \log L(\min,\sigma) & = -n\log\sigma - \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \min)/\sigma. \\[8pt] \frac\partial{\partial\sigma} \ell(\min,\sigma) & = - \frac n\sigma + \frac 1 {\sigma^2} \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i-\min) \\[8pt] & = \frac{-n\sigma + (\text{the sum above})}{\sigma^2} \qquad \begin{cases} >0 & \text{if } 0<\sigma< \text{sum}/n, \\ =0 & \text{if } \sigma= \text{sum}/n, \\ <0 & \text{if } \sigma > \text{sum}/n. \end{cases} \end{align} So the MLE for $\sigma$ is $\displaystyle \frac 1 n \sum_{i=1}^n \left( x_i - \min\{x_1, \ldots, x_n \} \right).$

Then the equivariance of MLEs says that the MLE for $\mu/\sigma$ is $$ \min\{x_1,\ldots,x_n\} \left/ \left( \frac 1 n \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \min\{x_1,\ldots,x_n\} \right)\right. . \tag 1 $$

Alternatively, we can let $\alpha = \dfrac\mu\sigma$ and then we have this density for each observation: $$ f(x) = \frac 1 \sigma e^{-(x/\sigma) + \alpha} \quad \text{for } x\ge\alpha\sigma. $$ Then find the MLE for $(\alpha,\sigma).$ The MLE for $\alpha$ will be what you see in line $(1)$ above.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. what principle lies behind the postive, negative and zero value assign to the partial with respect to σ .In the next question MLE for μ+σ, is it ok to add two ML of μ and σ? $\endgroup$
    – DglPr
    Commented Apr 21, 2020 at 3:58
  • $\begingroup$ @DglPr : A function increases on intervals where its derivative is positive and decreases on intervals where its derivative is negative. $\qquad$ $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 21, 2020 at 4:07
  • $\begingroup$ @DglPr : You can add the MLEs of $\mu$ and $\sigma$ to get the MLE of $\mu+\sigma$ because that is what equivariance of MLEs says. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 21, 2020 at 4:09
  • $\begingroup$ Apprecited.Thank you for your time and effort for the clarification. $\endgroup$
    – DglPr
    Commented Apr 21, 2020 at 4:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.