I have recently done some Logistic regression analysis whose results I will be presenting to my non-mathematician colleagues. One of the key aspects to this is how well the regression fits the data in each specific case.
I'm using the McFadden Pseudo $R^2$ for this work, which is $1-\frac{null~deviance}{residual ~ deviance} $ , and I'm aware of others.
In linear regression, $R^2$ can be described as a measure of 'the fraction of variance explained'.
How well can this be generalised to a pseudo $R^2$ derived from a logistic regression?
For the purposes of talking to (albeit technical) non mathematicians, is it permissible to say that 'given an $R^2$ of X, my model explains X% of the behaviour that we have observed in the data'?