If I have $\sqrt{n} (X_n - c) \xrightarrow[]{d} N(0,v) $ does it make any sense at all to say this implies that $X_n \xrightarrow[]{d} N(c, \frac{v}{n})$.
If not, what is the accurate way/notation that allows me to express the above?
If I have $\sqrt{n} (X_n - c) \xrightarrow[]{d} N(0,v) $ does it make any sense at all to say this implies that $X_n \xrightarrow[]{d} N(c, \frac{v}{n})$.
If not, what is the accurate way/notation that allows me to express the above?
No, it doesn't make much sense to say that $$X_n \overset{d}{\to} N\left(c, \frac{v}{n}\right)\,.$$ The main reason is because the $\overset{d}{\to}$ is as $n\to \infty$, and if $n\to \infty$ in the limit, then on the right hand side $v/n$ makes no sense. Instead, an appropriate consequence for the CLT is the use of the "approximately distributed" notation which is usually "$\approx$". So,
$$X_n \approx N\left(c, \frac{v}{n}\right)\,. $$