I've a dataset of 492 samples, for each sample I've information regarding if gene X has a germline mutation and a somatic mutation. I would like to test co-occurence of germline and somatic mutation in the same gene.
What I did is that I counted for each gene the number of patient harboring a germline and somatic mutation and then computed a fisher exact test.
Here is my final dataset :
# A tibble: 716 x 8
germ_gene somatic_gene only_germ only_som germ_and_som no_germ_no_som f.odd f.pvalue
<chr> <chr> <int> <int> <int> <int> <dbl> <dbl>
1 A2M A2M 73 9 2 408 1.24 0.519
2 ABCA1 ABCA1 89 12 1 390 0.366 0.930
3 ABCA12 ABCA12 39 12 4 437 3.72 0.0424
4 ABCA13 ABCA13 58 23 4 407 1.22 0.450
5 ABCA2 ABCA2 68 9 1 414 0.677 0.783
6 ABCB11 ABCB11 16 10 0 466 0 1
7 ABCB5 ABCB5 47 9 1 435 1.03 0.645
8 ABCC1 ABCC1 45 8 2 437 2.42 0.246
9 ABCC2 ABCC2 36 14 0 442 0 1
10 ABCC3 ABCC3 32 11 0 449 0 1
The fisher exact test is computed as this (example with the gene A2M) :
contingency <- matrix(c(germ_and_som,only_som,only_germ,no_germ_no_som),nrow=2,ncol=2,dimnames=list(c("germ","no_germ"),c("som","no_som")))
# som no_som
# germ 2 73
# no_germ 9 408
f.test <- fisher.test(contingency,alternative = "greater")
# Fisher's Exact Test for Count Data
# data:
# p-value = 0.5191
# alternative hypothesis: true odds ratio is greater than 1
# 95 percent confidence interval:
# 0.1890338 Inf
# sample estimates:
# odds ratio
# 1.241402
Is this strategy correct ? and if yes is that correct to put alternative = "greater" or should I let two-tails ?
Thank you