1
$\begingroup$

I am trying to master minimal/complete sufficient statistics, however I am having trouble when the distributions are discrete and involve indicator functions. Here is my 3 part question:

Let $X$ be a random variable from the following distribution: $$f(x;\theta) = \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} \theta & , & x = -1 \\ 1 - 2\theta & , & x = 0 \\ \theta & , & x = 1\end{array}\right.$$

where $0\leq \theta \leq\frac{1}{2}$.

  1. Find a minimal sufficient statistic for parameter $\theta$.

Answer: Define the indicator functions: $$I_1(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & , & x = -1 \\ 0 & , & {\rm otherwise}\end{array}\right.$$ $$I_2(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & , & x = 0 \\ 0 & , & {\rm otherwise}\end{array}\right.$$ $$I_3(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & , & x = 1 \\ 0 & , & {\rm otherwise}\end{array}\right.$$

Then, \begin{eqnarray*} f(x;\theta) & = & (\theta)^{I_1(x)}(1 - 2\theta)^{I_2(x)}(\theta)^{I_3(x)} \\ & = & \theta^{I_1(x) + I_3(x)}(1 - 2\theta)^{I_2(x)}. \end{eqnarray*}

Therefore, by the Factorization Theorem, a sufficient statistic for $\theta$ is: $$T(\underline{X}) = (I_1(x) + I_3(x), I_2(x))$$

To show that this is a minimum: $$\frac{f(x;\theta)}{f(y;\theta)} = \frac{\theta^{I_1(x) + I_3(x)}(1 - 2\theta)^{I_2(x)}}{\theta^{I_1(y) + I_3(y)}(1 - 2\theta)^{I_2(y)}}$$

is independent of $\theta$ if and only if $I_1(x) + I_3(x) = I_1(y) + I_3(y)$ and $I_2(x) = I_2(y)$. Therefore, $T(\underline{X})$ is a minimal sufficient statistic.

  1. Is $X$ a complete statistic?

Answer: By definition I know I need to show $E[u(z)] = 0$ implies $u(z) = 0$ for all $\theta$. However, I am unsure how to show $X$ is complete.

  1. From Part 1, is the statistic complete? Why?

Answer: Once again I understand the definition of complete, but am unsure on how to reach the conclusion based on: \begin{eqnarray*} E[u(z)] & = & 0 \\ \sum\limits_{z = -1}^1 u(z)\theta^{I_1(z) + I_3(z)}(1 - 2\theta)^{I_2(z)} & = & 0 \end{eqnarray*}

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I do not think your proposal is a minimum (if the sample size is fixed and known) $\endgroup$
    – Henry
    Commented Nov 30, 2020 at 1:58
  • $\begingroup$ Please add the self-study tag & read its wiki. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 15, 2022 at 13:23

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The minimal sufficient partition is

$$\{ \{-1,1\}, \{0\} \} $$

(since $\frac{f_\theta(1)}{f_\theta(-1)}$ does not depend on $\theta$).

So the minimal sufficient statistics(MSS) is

\begin{eqnarray} S(x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{cc} a & x=0 \\ b & x=-1,1 \end{array} \right. \end{eqnarray}

Is it a complete statistics?

$\forall \theta\in(0,\frac{1}{2})$

\begin{eqnarray} 0=E(g(S(X))) &=& g(b)\theta +g(a) (1-2\theta )+g(b)\theta \\ &=& g(a)+\left(g(b)-2g(a)+g(b)\right) \theta \\ &=& g(a)+2\left(g(b)-g(a)\right) \theta \end{eqnarray}

So you can easily check it.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.