3
$\begingroup$

I have made the Precision-Recall for my model. The red line is the prevalence. I do not understand the fluctuations in the beginning. Should it be more smooth? enter image description here

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

This happens when the model has made false positive predictions with high confidence. As a simple example, assume we have 1000 test cases, of which 100 are positive and 900 are negative. Assume the 20 most confident predictions are as shown in this table (TP/FP/FN/TN/Recall/Precision columns calculated using cumulative predictions from the first row to the current row):

Confidence
Threshold
True
Label
TP FP FN TN Recall Precision
0.995 1 1 0 99 900 0.01 1.00
0.99 0 1 1 99 899 0.01 0.50
0.985 0 1 2 99 898 0.01 0.33
0.98 0 1 3 99 897 0.01 0.25
0.975 1 2 3 98 897 0.02 0.40
0.97 1 3 3 97 897 0.03 0.50
0.965 1 4 3 96 897 0.04 0.57
0.96 0 4 4 96 896 0.04 0.50
0.955 0 4 5 96 895 0.04 0.44
0.95 1 5 5 95 895 0.05 0.50
0.945 1 6 5 94 895 0.06 0.55
0.94 0 6 6 94 894 0.06 0.50
0.935 0 6 7 94 893 0.06 0.46
0.93 0 6 8 94 892 0.06 0.43
0.925 0 6 9 94 891 0.06 0.40
0.92 0 6 10 94 890 0.06 0.38
0.915 1 7 10 93 890 0.07 0.41
0.91 1 8 10 92 890 0.08 0.44
0.905 1 9 10 91 890 0.09 0.47
0.9 1 10 10 90 890 0.1 0.50

At the start of the table, when the threshold is high and so there are very few positive predictions, a single mis-classification makes a large difference to the precision. When the above is plotted as a PRC it looks like this:

enter image description here

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.