Let $X_1, X_2$ be independent (not necessarily identically distributed) random variables. Assume we have estimates for the means $m_1, m_2$ and confidence internals $\left[a_1, b_1\right],\left[a_2, b_2\right]$ i.e. $\mathbb{E}\left[X_1\right]=m_1, \mathbb{E}\left[X_2\right]=m_2, \mathbb{P}\left(X_1 \in\left[a_1, b_1\right]\right) \geq 95 \%$ $\mathbb{P}\left(X_2 \in\left[a_2, b_2\right]\right) \geq 95 \%$. We are interested in the sum $Y:=X_1+X_2$. We know that the mean behaves nicely i. e. $\mathbb{E}[Y]=m_1+m_2$. What would be the best way to derive confidence intervals for $Y$ by computational means? What would be the statistical assumptions for each approach be?
On a side note. In my setting, I have many $X_1, \ldots, X_n$. The confidence intervals are symmetric around the mean.
I have thought about assuming gaussian $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ and then reverse-engineering the standard deviation for bootstrap or simply sum of standard deviation or something like that, but did not make it work.
qnorm(c(.025,.975))
(in R). Daniel, what do you know about the distribution of Xs? Anything apart from the mean and these quantiles? $\endgroup$