1
$\begingroup$

I am reading chapter 10 of the Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2011), by James P. Hobert on the Data Augmentation algorithm, which honestly just looks like a Gibbs sampler to me.

In section 10.2.4 (page 268) on the Central Limit Theorem, they calculate the covariance between $X_1$ and $X_0$, assuming that $X_0$ is sampled from the invariant distribution $f_X$, which implied that $X_1$ is also sampled from $f_X$. If this is the case, shouldn't they both independent? In what sense are they both sampled from an invariant distribution if they're not independent samples?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, data augmentation is a type of Gibbs sampler. While $X_t\sim f$ for all $t$'s when $X_0\sim f$, this does not imply they are iid from $f$. They are marginally from $f$, not jointly (iid) from $f$ $\endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    Commented May 14, 2023 at 17:11
  • $\begingroup$ See as an illustration the case of the AR(1) Markov chain. $\endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    Commented May 14, 2023 at 19:29
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Xi'an! I've been following you and your blog for a while. By this reasoning, the Markov Chain that produces $X_{t+1}=X_{t}$ would also satisfy this condition? $\endgroup$ Commented May 15, 2023 at 6:49
  • $\begingroup$ The constant Markov chain is the endless repetition of one single value, which is a realisation of the stationary distribution in the case it is generated that way. $\endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    Commented May 15, 2023 at 10:52

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.