2
$\begingroup$

Suppose I have a very large binary matrix representing $n$ customers and the $m$ products they bought, with $n$ and $m$ both rather large (in the order of millions). The matrix is also pretty sparse.

As computing all (or even just the $k$) exact nearest neighbors for every customer is clearly an intractable problem, I'm looking for a way to approximate it.

One idea I had is to use minhashing/LSH to first segment the customers into approximately $\frac{n}{k}$ buckets (this can be done by tweaking the similarity threshold I assume) and then simply consider that the $k$ neighbors of any given point are the other members of its corresponding bucket. Another slightly less efficient variant that might produce better results would be to segment into $\frac{n}{2k}$ buckets (i.e. bigger ones), and then search for the closest $k$ neighbors by brute force, inside a single bucket.

These schemes would obviously not yield exact results, but I wonder if they might be acceptable nonetheless. I'd also be interested in any other method or idea to tackle this problem.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The segmented approaches you propose appears reasonable and as do your concerns about the limitations of them. I have not worked on this field but given you problem formulation have you considered K-SVD? I am proposing this because you can take advantage both of the numerical tools available for sparse SVD decompositions as well as the conceptual framework of using SVD information to construct a $k$-means clustering. There are quite a few papers already available where you can check if the assumptions behind this approach can be generalized to accommodate your situation's characteristics (eg. here and here); in addition MATLAB code is already available by the original authors' website. Finally, check this CV link on "https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/43099/how-to-explain-the-connection-between-svd-and-clustering", it should give a a first helpful nudge.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.