2
$\begingroup$

I am using Gaussian Process Regression to interpolate my input points. I would like to measure the total uncertainty of my prediction thus I sum up the GPR prediction variances at all the testing points $x_i, i = \overline{1, N}$. $$ V = \sum_{i = 0}^N \sigma^2(x_i) $$

I was expecting that this total variance $V$ would reduce when I add more samples, and this is the case when I don't adapt the hyperparameters. However, when I adapt the hyperparameters using Maximum Likelihood, $V$ can increase when new points are added.

I found this quite counter-intuitive. Isn't hyperparameter adapting supposed to reduce the variance? Could some one please help me clarify this point. Thanks a lot!

I attach a simple Matlab script, based on GPML for your testing (http://www.gaussianprocess.org/gpml/code/matlab/doc/index.html)

covfunc = @covSEiso; hyp.cov = [log(0.1); log(1.0)]; 
likfunc = @likGauss; hyp.lik = log(0.01);

z = linspace(-1.0, 1.0, 101); z = z';

figure; grid on;
axis([-1.1, 1.1, -2, 2]);
x = [];
y = [];

ADAPT_PARAM = false;

while 1
    [xx, yy, button] = ginput(1);

    if button == 3
        break;
    end

    x = [x; xx];
    y = [y; yy];

    if ADAPT_PARAM
    % Adapt the hyperparams
        hyp.cov = [log(0.1); log(1.0)]; 
        hyp = minimize(hyp, @gp, -100, @infExact, [], covfunc, likfunc, x, y);
    end

    [m, s2] = gp(hyp, @infExact, [], covfunc, likfunc, x, y, z);
    f = [m+2*sqrt(s2); flipdim(m-2*sqrt(s2),1)];

    fill([z; flipdim(z,1)], f, [7 7 7]/8); 
    axis([-1.1, 1.1, -2, 2]); grid on; hold on;
    plot(z, m, 'LineWidth', 2);
    plot(x, y, 'r+', 'MarkerSize', 12)
    hold off;

    disp(['Total variance ', num2str(sum(s2))]);
end
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I would like to help you but i don't understand matlab code. If you want to explain what you mean with gaussian process regression, what is exactly the model you are fitting and what you mean with "hyperparameter", maybe I (and others) can help you $\endgroup$ – niandra82 Dec 1 '14 at 14:12
3
$\begingroup$

Isn't hyperparameter adapting supposed to reduce the variance?

Nope, not necessarily! The most common way to tune parameters is to maximise the log marginal likelihood

$$\log P(y|x,\theta) = -0.5y^TK^{-1}y - 0.5\log|K| - c$$

Notice that there are two terms at play here and a constant which I'll ignore. The first is the data fit term which is maximized when the data fits the model very well (lower $V$). The second is a penalty on the complexity of the model, ie smoother the better (higher $V$). When you optimise you try and find the balance between the two and this changes with the data you observe.

Check out Chapter 5 of GPML.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.