My question relates to a confusion between how the Student-t distribution is often documented versus how it is used.
In the documentation the Student-t is used (from Wikipedia):
when estimating the mean of a normally distributed population in situations where the sample size is small and population standard deviation is unknown
As per this definition, the degrees of freedom parameters is equal to n-1 where n = number of observations.
My confusion comes from the fact that the Student-t is often used to model not the difference between the true mean of a population and the sample mean, but to estimate the distribution of the population itself. As such, is this a misuse of the Student-t distribution? If not:
- The degrees of freedom cannot be defined as n-1 as there is no notion that as the sample size increases the sample mean converges to the population mean. Rather, it is posited that the population is distributed as a
t(v)
no matter what the sample size, i.e. as n increases it doesn't converge to a normal. Hence, how is the degrees of freedom chosen/estimated in this case? The only answer is I can come up with is iteratively trying different values and selecting the value with the best model fit. - Similarly, when standardising and un-standardising the practice of multiplying by the square root of n shouldn't be necessary as the underlying assumption of that is that as n increases the difference in mean will go to zero. However, if you are using the Student-t to estimate the population distribution that is not the purpose. As such, I would assume you would standardise and un-standardise without the square root of n part. Is that correct?
E.g. the below is how the t-stat is estimated, however this method isn't valid if one is not estimating the t-stat, i.e. testing if the difference is zero $$\frac{X −μ}{(σ/√n)} \thicksim t(v)$$
Similarly, I have seen other people use the following to un-standardise: $$t*\frac{\sigma}{√(v/(v-2))} + \mu$$ Where v is the degrees of freedom here
Apologies if this is a silly question, the answer me be very obvious. I ask this as I often see the degrees of freedom for Student-t distributions being chosen just as if out of a hat and different ways of un-standardising samples from the Student-t, which don't seem to make sense given the purpose/context.