# Can we say 50% of data will be between 25th-75th percentile?

Let's say we have the following dataframe:

TY_MAX
141  1.004622
142  1.004645
143  1.004660
144  1.004672
145  1.004773
146  1.004820
147  1.004814
148  1.004807
149  1.004773
150  1.004820
151  1.004814
152  1.004834
153  1.005117
154  1.005023
155  1.004928
156  1.004834
157  1.004827
158  1.005023
159  1.005248
160  1.005355

25th: 1.0031185409705132
50th: 1.004634349800723
75th: 1.0046683578907745
Calculated 50th: 1.003893449430644

I am a bit confused here. If we get 75th prcentile, 75% of data should be below that percentile. And if we can 25th percentile, 25% of data should be below that 25th. Now i am thinking that 50% of data should be between 25th and 50th. And also 50th percentile gives me a different value. Fair enough, which means 50% of data should be below this value. But my question is if my approach correct?

EDIT: And also can we say 98% of data will be between 1st-99th of percentile?

• Yes, but you can equally say 50% of the data won't be! Commented Jul 31, 2018 at 14:54

Yes.

• 75% of your data are below the 75th percentile.
• 25% of your data are below the 25th percentile.
• Therefore, 50% (=75%-25%) of your data are between the two, i.e., between the 25th and the 75th percentile.
• Completely analogously, 98% of your data are between the 1st and the 99th percentile.
• And the bottom half of your data, again 50%, are below the 50th percentile.

These numbers may not be completely correct, especially if you have low numbers of data. Note also that there are different conventions on how quantiles and percentiles are actually computed.

• another reason why your numbers may be off is when you have a lot ties (observations with the same value) Commented Jul 31, 2018 at 13:00
• "Most common used percentile" - do you mean which type as per the type argument in R's quantile()? Hyndman & Fan recommend type 7, which is also the default. To be quite honest, the differences are minor. Or do you mean what percentage is commonly used? That will depend on your application, we can't help you with that. And of course, the more data you get, the more accurate you will be. What level of accuracy is enough will depend on your data and your application. Commented Jul 31, 2018 at 13:18
• What level you need will depend on what you will use your analysis for. Commented Jul 31, 2018 at 13:25
• "Not completely correct, especially if you have low numbers of data." - might be worth clarifying this as there are at two factors I can see at play: (1) sample size may not be exactly divisible by 4 or 100 or whatever is needed for the quantile in question; (2) data points may not be unique (e.g. for data on a whole number, 1-to-5 scale, you can expect many repeated value; quartiles in that case can behave very badly with respect to properties like "50% of data lie above the median" or "between Q1 and Q3" and percentiles are often a waste of time) Commented Jul 31, 2018 at 16:32
• @StephanKolassa, it seems Hyndman & Fan recomended type 8. (Which is also mentioned in ?quantile.) Commented Aug 1, 2018 at 12:00

Ideally, yes.

Percentiles are usually interpreted in terms of the normal distribution (as normality is often an underlying, sometimes unstated, assumption when computing any sort of elementary statistical measures). The distribution does not have to be normal, however.

According to this website...

The standard normal distribution can also be useful for computing percentiles. For example, the median is the 50th percentile, the first quartile is the 25th percentile, and the third quartile is the 75th percentile. In some instances it may be of interest to compute other percentiles, for example the 5th or 95th. The formula below is used to compute percentiles of a normal distribution: $X = \mu + Z \sigma$

So, if we assume normality, we can easily compute any percentile we are looking for. Percentiles require no distributional assumptions, however, and are bound to the data from which they are computed. This means that percentiles can provide meaningful benchmarks for both normal and non-normal distributions. You may also use percentiles in a probability interpretation, of course based on the measurements you currently have, which could be good or bad indicators of the true underlying distribution.

According to this site...

Direct interpretation: consider the 10th ($P_{10}$) and 90th ($P_{90}$) percentiles: "given the available data, we know that soil property $p < P_{10}$ 10% of the time, and, $p < P_{90}$ 90% of the time". This same statement can be framed using probabilities or proportions: "given the available data, soil property $p$ is within the range of {$P_{10} − P_{90}$} 80% of the time".

• To be honest, I don't think your emphasis on the normal distribution is useful here. The OP is solely interested in empirical percentiles. Commented Jul 31, 2018 at 13:19
• Agree with @StephanKolassa, particularly since the OP's example data is not normal. Commented Jul 31, 2018 at 16:05