We consider the gamma uniform G distribution as specified by Torabi and Montazeri: $$f(x) = \frac{1}{\Gamma (a)}\frac{g(x)}{[1-G(x)]^2}\left[\frac{G(x)}{1-G(x)}\right]^{a-1}\exp\left[\frac{G(x)}{1-G(x)}\right]$$ where $G$ is a valid c.d.f., $g$ the corresponding p.d.f. and $a > 0$.

My question is this:

If $G$ belongs to the Gumbel domain of attraction, that is, if there exists $\gamma(t)>0$ such that $$\lim_{t \uparrow w(G)}\frac{1-G(t+x\gamma(t))}{1-G(t)}=e^{-x},$$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$, and if the upper end point $w(G) = w(F)$, then is it true that $F$ belongs to the same (Gumbel) domain of attraction as $G$?

The sticking point here is the exponential term, as we consider $$\lim_{t \uparrow w(F)}\frac{1-F(t+x\gamma(t))}{1-F(t)}=\lim_{t \uparrow w(F)}\frac{f(t+x\gamma(t))(1+x\gamma^\prime(t))}{f(t)},$$ where the equality follows from L'Hopital's rule. Now this gives rise to the term $$\lim_{t \uparrow w(G)}\frac{\exp\left[\frac{G(t+x\gamma(t))}{1-G(t+x\gamma(t))}\right]}{\exp\left[\frac{G(t)}{1-G(t)}\right]}.$$ How do I evaluate this limit?

Any help much appreciated.

  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand the question; "if there exists ... such that $lim...$ for all $x$" - what does this mean? Should that limit be equal to something, or must that limit exist for all $x$? $\endgroup$ – InfProbSciX Nov 1 '18 at 14:50
  • $\begingroup$ Fixed the mistake. $\endgroup$ – Will Nov 1 '18 at 14:56
  • $\begingroup$ What is $w(G)$? Is this the upper end point in the sense that $t \uparrow w(G)$ implies $G(t) \uparrow 1$? Or do you mean that $t \uparrow w(G)$ implies $G(t) \uparrow w$? Or do you mean something else? $\endgroup$ – Ben Nov 6 '18 at 4:42
  • $\begingroup$ In the definition of the gamma uniform G distribution, a minus sign should be found in the exponentiated bracket. $\endgroup$ – Yves Dec 4 '18 at 7:35

Preliminary interpretation: Your question does not clearly specify what you mean by $w(G)$, but you say that this is an "upper end point"of the distribution. I am going to assume that you mean that $t \uparrow w(G)$ implies $G(t) \uparrow 1$. My answer proceeds on this basis.

To simplify the notation in this problem we treat $\gamma$ as fixed and denote $G_x(t) \equiv G(t+x\gamma(t))$. We then define the functions:

$$E_x(t) \equiv \frac{1-G_x(t)}{1-G(t)} \quad \quad \quad \bar{E}_x(t) \equiv \frac{G_x(t)}{G(t)}.$$

These functions are related by:

$$\bar{E}_x(t) = \frac{1- E_x(t)(1-G(t))}{G(t)}.$$

By assumption, for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$ you have $\lim_{t \uparrow w(G)} E_x(t)= e^{-x}$. By the composition law of limits (and assuming the required continuity for it to apply) we also have:

$$\lim_{t \uparrow w(G)} \bar{E}_x(t) = \lim_{t \uparrow w(G)} \frac{1- e^{-x}(1-G(t))}{G(t)}.$$

We now define and simplify the function:

$$\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} H(t,x) &\equiv \frac{G_x(t)}{1-G_x(t)} - \frac{G(t)}{1-G(t)} \\[6pt] &= \frac{1-G(t)}{1-G_x(t)} \cdot \frac{G_x(t)}{G(t)} \cdot \frac{G(t)}{1-G(t)} - \frac{G(t)}{1-G(t)} \\[6pt] &= \frac{G(t)}{1-G(t)} \Bigg[ \frac{1-G(t)}{1-G_x(t)} \cdot \frac{G_x(t)}{G(t)} - 1 \Bigg] \\[6pt] &= \frac{G(t)}{1-G(t)} \Bigg[ \frac{\bar{E}_x(t)}{E_x(t)} - 1 \Bigg]. \\[6pt] \end{aligned} \end{equation}$$

Hence, applying the composition law again yields:

$$\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \lim_{t \uparrow w(G)} (1-G(t)) \cdot H(t,x) &= \lim_{t \uparrow w(G)} G(t) \Bigg[ \frac{\bar{E}_x(t)}{E_x(t)} - 1 \Bigg] \\[6pt] &= \lim_{t \uparrow w(G)} G(t) \Bigg[ \frac{1- e^{-x}(1-G(t))}{e^{-x} G(t)} - 1 \Bigg] \\[6pt] &= \lim_{t \uparrow w(G)} G(t) \Bigg[ \frac{1- e^{-x} + e^{-x} G(t) - e^{-x} G(t)}{e^{-x} G(t)} \Bigg] \\[6pt] &= \lim_{t \uparrow w(G)} G(t) \cdot \frac{1- e^{-x}}{e^{-x} G(t)} \\[6pt] &= \frac{1- e^{-x}}{e^{-x}} \\[6pt] &= e^{x}-1. \\[6pt] \end{aligned} \end{equation}$$

Now, the limit you want to find is $\lim_{t \uparrow w(G)} \exp(H(t,x))$. This limit is infinity, but there is a related limit that may be useful:

$$\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \lim_{t \uparrow w(G)} \exp(H(t,x))^{\exp(1-G(t))} &= \lim_{t \uparrow w(G)} \exp( (1-G(t)) \cdot H(t,x)) \\[6pt] &= \exp(e^x-1). \\[6pt] \end{aligned} \end{equation}$$

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ The next to last line doesn't make sense to me. Could you explain the jump from a limit of the form $e^{(a/b)}/e^{(c/d)}$ to $e^{(a/c)}/e^{(b/d)}$? $\endgroup$ – Will Nov 8 '18 at 22:59
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, that's a mistake - I will edit to fix. $\endgroup$ – Ben Nov 8 '18 at 23:17
  • $\begingroup$ When can we expect the edit? $\endgroup$ – Will Nov 9 '18 at 0:34
  • $\begingroup$ @Will: I have now made a major edit to correct the previous misinterpretation of your question. It should be okay now. $\endgroup$ – Ben Nov 9 '18 at 1:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.