0
$\begingroup$

In Cryer and Chan the book Timer Series with Application in R. We find the following piece.

Consider the first-order autoregressive process, abbreviated AR(1), in detail.

Assume the series is stationary and satisfies.

$Y_{t} = \phi Y_{t - 1} + e_{t}$

Where $e_{t}$ is a white noise process.

We assume that the process mean has been subtracted out so that the series mean is zero.

I don't understand what this means.

Does this implicitly imply the following logic?

$Y_{t} = \phi Y_{t - 1} + e_{t} - \mu + \mu$

Suppose that:

$W_{t} = \phi W_{t - 1} + e_{t} + \mu$

and that:

$X_{t} = W_{t} - \mu = \phi W_{t - 1} + e_{t} - \mu + \mu$

In this case, the time series $Y_{t}$ is stochastically equal to the following time series $X_{t}$.

Am I correct?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Your calculations are correct but the meaning is simpler. The authors assume that $\mathbb{E}\left[Y_t\right] = 0$. If this were not the case, say $\mathbb{E}\left[Y_t\right] = \mu$, then substitute $Z_t = Y_t - \mu$ for $Y_t$ and follow along with the book.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Their calculations are not correct; $\mu$ is not the mean in their notation. $\endgroup$
    – Chris Haug
    Commented Mar 8, 2022 at 14:08
1
$\begingroup$

If you have a stationary AR(1) process given by:

$$W_t = \mu + \phi W_{t-1} + \varepsilon_t$$

Then the mean is:

$$\mathbb{E}(W_t) = \frac{\mu}{1-\phi}$$

Note that the mean is not $\mu$ in general. If you subtract the mean and define a new process:

$$X_t := W_t - \mathbb{E}(W_t) = W_t - \frac{\mu}{1-\phi}$$

Therefore $W_t = X_t + \frac{\mu}{1-\phi}$ and you can substitute this back into the first equation to get:

$$ X_t + \frac{\mu}{1-\phi} = \mu + \phi \left(X_{t-1} + \frac{\mu}{1-\phi}\right) + \varepsilon_t $$

Or:

$$ X_t = \mu \left[1 - \frac{1}{1-\phi} + \frac{\phi}{1-\phi}\right] + \phi X_{t-1} + \varepsilon_t $$

Which is just:

$$X_t = \phi X_{t-1} + \varepsilon_t$$

This is a stationary AR(1) process with mean zero.

The issue with your derivation is that you use the wrong mean and then end up with an equation that doesn't have the same process on both sides ($X_t$ on the left and $W_{t-1}$ on the right).

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ +1 For pointing out the mistake I didn't. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 9, 2022 at 8:43
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "You can substitute this back into the first equation to get" $X_t = \phi X_{t-1} + \varepsilon_t$.? Can you explain how this substitution works?@Chris Haug $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 9, 2022 at 19:55
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielDeWet I edited my answer to include intermediate steps, hope that helps. $\endgroup$
    – Chris Haug
    Commented Mar 9, 2022 at 22:04
  • $\begingroup$ What happened to the term $ \mu \left[1 - \frac{1}{1-\phi} + \frac{\phi}{1-\phi}\right]$ on the last line @ChrisHaug? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 10, 2022 at 20:16
  • $\begingroup$ It certainly didn't cancel out. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 10, 2022 at 20:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.