2
$\begingroup$

I want to know the effect of differentiation on the independence of random variables. For a random variable $X$, when are $f^{(n)}(X)$ and $f^{(n+k)}(X)$ independent?, $\forall n\geq0\;, k\geq 1$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ One guess is when $X$ is a degenerate random variable, but you should check to verify. $\endgroup$
    – Galen
    Commented Mar 17, 2023 at 20:41
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ There's nothing special about two derivatives, so you're really asking about when $(U,V)=(f(X),g(X))$ are independent for sufficiently differentiable functions $f$ and $g.$ Equivalently, you are asking when a 2D variable $(U,V)$ that is restricted to a connected subset of the image of a differentiable curve be independent. That answers itself when you draw a picture of that image: it must be either a horizontal or vertical line segment. That is, one of $U$ or $V$ (or both) are constant. This does not imply $X$ is degenerate, but @Galen has the right general idea. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Mar 17, 2023 at 21:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It also works for $k$ large enough when $f$ is a polynomial. $\endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    Commented Mar 18, 2023 at 5:27
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps there are also cases involving limits, such as $k \rightarrow \infty$ for a given $n$. $\endgroup$
    – Galen
    Commented Mar 18, 2023 at 5:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As another example of the complications, let $X$ have a uniform distribution on $\{0,1,2,3\}.$ It is straightforward to construct a function $f$ for which the graph of $f^{(n)}$ passes through the points $(0,0),$ $(1,1),$ $(2,1),$ and $(3,0),$ while $f^{(n+k)}$ passes through $(0,0),$ $(1,0),$ $(2,1),$ and $(3,1),$ so that $(f^{(n)}(X),f^{(n+k)}(X))$ has the uniform distribution on $\{(0,0),(1,0),(0,1),(1,1)\}.$ Clearly $f^{(n)}(X)$ and $f^{(n+k)}(X)$ are independent. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Mar 19, 2023 at 14:03

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

A more modest property, namely a lack of correlation, holds in a series of cases. Consider the case when $f$ is invertible and let the density of $X$ write as $p(f(x))$ (wlog). Further assume (wlog) that $\mathbb E[f(X)]=0$. Then, by a change of variables, \begin{align}\text{cov}(f(X),f'(X))&=\int f(x)f'(x)p(f(x))\text dx\\&=\int f(x)\frac{\text df(x)}{\text dx} p(f(x))\text dx\\&= \int f(x) p(f(x)){\text df(x)}\\ &= \mathbb E_p[F]\\ &= 0 \end{align}

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ This looks like a good idea, but it's unclear how your "$f$" might be related to the "$f$" of the question. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Mar 18, 2023 at 11:08
  • $\begingroup$ That's not at all evident, because the question concerns the nth and (n+k)th derivatives of $f,$ neither of which are mentioned here. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Mar 19, 2023 at 13:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.