1
$\begingroup$

I've been doing the univariate analysis for a retrospective cohorts study. In this variable in particular, none of the no-cured patients had a growth of grampositive bacteria in their culture. Since there's a 0 in one of the boxes, I thought the best test was Fisher-Freeman-Halton's exact test (since the table is larger than 2x2). However, when I try to do it in SPSS, it says that 0 boxes expected a count less than 5 and that the minimum expected count is 6.62 (which is not what I observe). The chi-square p-value for this variable is 0.005, and the Fisher-Freeman-Halton's exact test p-value is 0.001.

I would like to do a multivariate analysis including all the variables that were significant in the univariate analysis performing a binary logistic regression analysis, but since there's a 0, I wouldn't be able to obtain the adjusted OR for the Grampositives.

Any ideas of what would be the best approach? Thanks in advance!

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Then, since I observe that one box contains a 0, should I take the Chi-Square or the Fisher? It would make sense to add this variable to the multivariate analysis? $\endgroup$
    – user406570
    Feb 25 at 19:44

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

My answer to your initial question is that you shouldn't worry about the message, because (1) it is telling you that the minimum expected count is greater than 5 (the table in your question shows observed counts), which is the usually accepted cutoff for when it's OK to do a chi-squared test and (2) even if it were below 5, an exact test like Fisher's isn't harmed by this. (FET makes fixed-margin assumptions that may or may not be problematic, but you probably don't need to worry about this ...)

However, I have more to say about your analysis:

  • since your three columns are "total", "cured", and "not cured" (the first is the sum of the second and third), it really doesn't make any sense to analyze this as a 4x3 table (where there are 4 predictor [row] categories and 3 response [column] categories). It would be better to analyze a 4x2 table with only "cured" and "not cured".
  • Although it's a very popular approach, I would not recommend modeling by first screening for significant predictors in a series of univariate analyses and then incorporating the significant variables in a single multivariate analysis. I would only do this kind of two-stage process if I had a very large data set, so large that it wasn't computationally practical to run the model with all of the predictors, and if I only cared about prediction rather than inference. Otherwise, this is a recipe for overfitting and overconfidence (confidence intervals that are too narrow and p-values that are too small).
  • My suggestion would be to fit a single multivariate logistic regression with a reasonable subset of predictors selected a priori, and to read Chapter 4 of Frank Harrell's Regression Modeling Strategies about modeling strategies for analyses that are focused on exploration, prediction, or inference.
  • your Gram-positive observations (18 cured, 0 not cured) will indeed be a problem, leading to complete separation in a logistic regression; you can read about possible solutions here or here (although I'm not sure the best solutions will be available in SPSS ...)
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.