3
$\begingroup$

I want to statistically compare personality scores between different groups, but people can be in multiple groups. Is there anything problematic in just doing an ANOVA or a t-test since a respondent can belong to more than one group? Only problem I can see is that it's harder to get a significant difference, but that ist okay with the theory.

(similar question unanswered: Test like ANOVA but allowing for multiple group membership )

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Below are two screenshot excerpts from "SPSS Algorithms" pdf document (you can easily find it on the internet), CTABLES procedure chapter. SPSS uses (in the Custom Tables procedure) a little-modified formula for the test statistic when the groups being compared are not disjoint but are "multiple response set" groups.

Here is the piece for testing between group means:

enter image description here

and here is between two proportions:

enter image description here

That was about pairwise comparisons between groups.

As for ANOVA, I expect it to be more problematic, because ANOVA is an omnibus test for k groups and thus puts more restrictive assumptions on the groups than a comparison of a pair of groups does. It will be harder to "correct for the groups' overlap". So don't do ANOVA, go directly to pairwise tests.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Okay. Thanks a lot, also for editing my question. $\endgroup$
    – Tim
    Commented May 21 at 13:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.