Search Results

A similar interpretation can be made with labor quality. … Finally, the negative coefficient for the interaction Term (Labor Cost * Labor Quality) suggests that the combined effect of labor cost and labor quality on FDI is less than the sum of their individual …

As you have described it, you have two models, in Raudenbush & Bryk notation: Model 1: Random intercept, no interaction Level 1 (person-task): $$ Y_{ti} = \pi_{0i} + \pi_{1i}\times \text{Arial}_{ti} + … with proportional odds, using a generalized linear model specification, we change $Y_{ti}$ to the linear predictor $\eta_{ti}$ and from Bauer and Sterba we have the following model (moving the error term …

I am confused about how to interpret the interaction term in the regression result. … Please help me understand what is the correct interpretation. …

This interpretation of main effects in the presence of an interaction, is a bit similar to the interpretation of the intercept in the presence of a slope. … A related question is: Why do my (coefficients, standard errors & CIs, p-values & significance) change when I add a term to my regression model? …

term between infector and infectee infector : infectee introduces four interaction terms (e.g., of Aa, Ae, Ea, and Ee, respectively, since C and c are the reference groups in the main effects). … No, this interpretation is incorrect. The absolute size of each exposed group does not affect the expected risk or infection probability if sampling within each group was random and representative. …

Consequently, the interpretation of these interaction terms is always relative to the reference-level combination of both factors, and missing interaction terms (such as for the reference levels) are implied … The interaction term for $x_1:z_2$ can be calculated by subtracting the interaction term for $x_2:z_2$ from the main effect of $z_2$: $$ x_1:z_2 = \beta_2 - \beta_4 = 0.07071 - (-0.21342) = 0.28413 $$ …

term in the model (it is one of the variables in the interaction). … Note that I am not talking about interpretation - since the interaction qualifies the main effect anyway, I just want to know which data to include in my results table :) Thanks in advance! …

To facilitate the interpretation of coefficients, I want to report the average marginal effects, but as it's my first time working with these estimates, I have some trouble understanding them. … Thanks for any help with the interpretation! …

If I run such a model, my interaction term gets omitted because of perfect collinearity between the interaction term and the time dummy. What am I missing here? … I am trying to understand the Callaway & Sant'Anna paper regarding staggered DiD, but I'm having issues understanding the implementation and interpretation of the model. …

Coeducation, academic performance, and subject choice: evidence from quasi-random classroom assignments, Education Economics, 26:6, 574-592, DOI: 10.1080/09645292.2018.1515310 My question is about the interpretation … The third row presents estimates for the interaction term between coeducation and the student being a female. …

Initially, I predicted Y through multiple regression analysis using A1, A2 and their interaction term, and found that the residuals were small, but there was a pattern in the variation of the residuals … Is there any other suitable statistical analysis to justify the interpretation of A1 and A2 on Y? …

term. … For both models though, the interaction term is not significant ($p = 0.184$). This means we can interpret the former as the overall effect of oxygen administration. …

See the meaning of coefficients in a common model specification with an interaction Frank Harrell's interpretation of interaction in regression results. … Instead, specifying one main effect and one interaction M + L : M seem to offer the easiest interpretation among three groups where the coefficient of M gives its higher effect than L and the coefficient …

term in the model. … In the interaction term for med:treat2, we see a negative effect. For the mediation analysis with treat1, the ACME (treated) is positive. The ADE is negative, following the logic in the regressions. …

0.756 -0.318 -0.689 0.530 agenew:yer2 0.442 -0.374 -0.649 -0.684 0.542 0.495 trtmnttr::2 -0.314 0.532 0.461 0.485 -0.758 -0.704 -0.710 I interpret the significant (P = 0.044) interaction …