2
$\begingroup$

Is there a reference that has the value of the following integral: $$F(a) =\int_{-\infty}^{a}xt_{\nu}(x)dx = \int_{-\infty}^{a}\frac{x}{s\sqrt{\nu\pi}}\frac{\Gamma\left(\frac{\nu+1}{2}\right)}{\Gamma\left(\frac{\nu}{2}\right)}\left(1+\frac{1}{\nu}\left(\frac{x-m}{s}\right)^2\right)^{-\frac{\nu+1}{2}} d x$$ where $t_{\nu}(x)$ is the pdf for Student's t distribution.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think your $F(a)$ is the mean of the truncated t-distribution with lower limited = $-\infty$ and upper limited = $a$. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truncated_distribution Except that yours isn't normalized. $\endgroup$
    – const-ae
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 15:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is straightforward to evaluate in terms of the Student $t$ CDF and elementary functions, so why do you need a reference? $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 16:05
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, perhaps it is straightforward, but it's not a one-line long derivation. $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Commented Aug 28, 2020 at 16:40

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

You're right: this is not (quite) a one-liner. But I can do a thorough job in just two lines by building on what you already know.

Let's make some standard preliminary observations to simplify the work and establish the notation.

Your $t_\nu$ is a location-scale family based on the Student $t$ distribution with $\nu$ degrees of freedom with a location parameter $m$ (which I will write as $\mu$ to make it clear it's a parameter and not a variable) and scale parameter $s$ (which I will write as $\sigma$). That is tantamount to a change of units of measurement of the original Student $t$ variable $Z$ to a new variable $X=\sigma Z + \mu.$ Thus, your integral becomes a linear combination of integrals with integrands $zt_\nu(z)$ and $t_\nu(z)$ (where from now on I will use "$t_\nu$" in the narrower sense of the standard Student $t$ density). The latter integrates, by definition, to the (standard) student $t$ CDF, which I will write $$T_\nu(z) = \int^z t_\nu(x)\,\mathrm{d}x.$$

This leaves us with the (genuine) problem of integrating $xt_\nu(x)$ for the standard $t$ density $t_\nu.$ The answer is contained in one of your previous questions, where you note

$$\frac{d}{dx}t_{\nu}=-\frac{\nu+1}{\nu+x^2}\,xt_{\nu}(x).$$

This can be rewritten (using the product rule of differentiation) in the form

$$\begin{aligned}\frac{d}{dx} \left(\frac{x^2+\nu}{1-\nu}\,t_\nu(x)\right) &= \frac{2x}{1-\nu}\,t_\nu(x) + \frac{x^2+\nu}{1-\nu}\frac{d}{dx}t_\nu(x) = \left(\frac{2}{1-\nu} - \frac{1+\nu}{1-\nu}\right) x t_\nu(x) \\ &= xt_\nu(x). \end{aligned}$$

In other words, you already know an antiderivative of $xt_\nu(x).$ The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus states this is the indefinite integral. All we need to compute is the constant of integration. But, provided $\nu \gt 1,$ the integrand $xt_\nu(x)$ decreases sufficiently rapidly as $a\to -\infty$ that the limiting value of its integral must be $0.$ Thus, the constant of integration is $0.$

Putting these results together gives for $\nu \gt 1$

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{\sigma}\int^a x t_\nu\left(\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}\right)\mathrm{d}x &= \sigma \int^{(a-\mu)/\sigma} z t_\nu(z)\,\mathrm{d}z + \mu \int^{(a-\mu)/\sigma} t_\nu(z)\,\mathrm{d}z \\ &= \sigma \left(\frac{\left(\frac{a-\mu}{\sigma}\right)^2+\nu}{1-\nu}\right) t_\nu\left(\frac{a-\mu}{\sigma}\right) + \mu T_\nu\left(\frac{a-\mu}{\sigma}\right). \end{aligned}$$

When $\nu \le 1,$ you may verify the integral does not converge.


As a quick check, I computed this integral (as a function of $a$) both numerically and using the final formula. Here is a plot of the two computations, one in black and the other in red. They agree.

Figure

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.