I have a log-likelihood function with two parameters: $\mathcal{l}(\theta_1,\theta_2)$.
When I run a simulation, the maximum likelihood estimator $\widehat{\theta}=[\widehat{\theta}_1,\widehat{\theta}_2]'$ yields a reasonable value for $\theta_1$ and an over-estimated value for $\theta_2$.
For example, if the true $\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$ are 10 and 15, respectively, then $\widehat{\theta}_1=9.97$ and $\widehat{\theta}_2=19.5$.
In my setup, the incorrect estimate is an expected event. That is, theoretically the estimator $\widehat{\theta}_2$ is inconsistent.
However, I want to know whether the MLE always produces an over-estimated value.
Hence, my question is that Is it possible to know whether the MLE over-estimates the parameters always?