No.
It is possible that just by chance your value of X is very high or low compared to the population value. If so, you'd expect few (or at least fewer than 85%) repetitions to have values in your confidence interval.
The correct interpretation is that if you repeated the experiment and calculations many times, you'd expect 85% of those confidence intervals to include the true population value, and for the other 15% to exclude that true population value. Unless you are doing simulations, you won't know the true population value, so will never know if a particular experiment is part of the 85% or part of the 15%. (This interpretation is based on a bunch of standard assumptions about sampling, and the population distribution.)