I have carried out an experiment, during which the participants tried several authentication methods; as well as a pre- and post-survey, which measured the participants' familiarity and adoption of said methods, their opinion of them, as well as motivation to use them. The questionnaires both have the same questions (e.g. On a scale from 1 to 5, please provide your opinion on monetary cost, associated with the use of each authentication method
), and I'm using Paired T-Test on the means that I calculate from the answers to these 5-point Likert scale questions.
However, there are a couple of questions that have categorical answers (for example, for Do you use the following authentication methods?
I could have simple Yes/No
answers, and for How often do you use them?
I could have a few categorical choices Several times a day, Once a day, Several times a week,...
, or another simple Yes/No
for Have you considered changing your current method of authentication for service X?
).
I would still like to find out, whether the participants' opinions and practices have changed in between the first and second survey, when the experiment was conducted. Is there any test I could use to do before-after analysis on such categorical data, or is my only option to describe it using Descriptive statistics (e.g. Pre - Yes: 60%, No: 40%
and Post - 80%, No: 20%
)?
While I'm at it, I would also like to ask, whether it's possible to observe the relation between the participants' opinion from the survey (Q: Provide your opinion on time required to login
, 5-point Likert scale ranging from Very short to Very long), and actual experimental data (Login time measured in seconds per participant).