3
$\begingroup$

I have some trouble showing sufficiency for largest order statistic ${x}_{n}$. This is from Casella's text, problem 1.6.3.

Let ${p}_{\theta}$ be a density function.
${p}_{\theta}(x)=c({\theta})f(x)$ for $0<x<\theta$.

If ${X}_{1},{X}_{2},....{X}_{n}$ are iid with density ${p}_{\theta}$, show that ${X}_{(n)}$ is sufficient for $\theta$.

I understand that by the definition of sufficiency, if the summary statistic, $T$, is independent of the parameter $\theta$, for all $t$, then it is sufficient.

How do I actually show that? It seems obvious that $c(\theta)$ and $f(x)$ will not get involved with each other. And there is not an explicit formula for me to work with, like normal or student t.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You must reformulate your question, as it stands, it does not make very much sense (maybe only a TeXnical problem?). As it stands, $f(x)$ does not depend on $\theta$, so your parameter $\theta$ is not even identifiable! (If you try to normalize your density so that it always integrates to one, you will cancel $\theta$!!!) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 10, 2012 at 19:37
  • $\begingroup$ @kjetilbhalvorsen: for some reason, after I post, I am still seeing the LaTex code, I can't see the Greek letters. $\endgroup$
    – user13985
    Commented Sep 10, 2012 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ The title is a little misleading. Are you asking about the sufficiency of the order statistics $(X_{(1)},\dots,X_{(n)})$ of a random sample, or are you asking about the sufficiency of the maximum $X_{(n)}$ (maybe for the $\mathrm{Uniform}[0,\theta]$ model, which is easy to prove)? $\endgroup$
    – Zen
    Commented Sep 10, 2012 at 19:46
  • $\begingroup$ @Zen: I am asking for the sufficiency of the largest order statistic. I used X(n) to represent largest order statistic. $\endgroup$
    – user13985
    Commented Sep 10, 2012 at 19:52
  • $\begingroup$ Even with the edits this question does not make sense, for reasons pointed out in previous comments, and will need to be improved if it is to remain open. $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Sep 10, 2012 at 20:24

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

OK, let me do the reformulation. Let $f$ be a function defined for $x\ge 0$ such that $f(x) >0$, and define $c(\theta)^{-1} = \int_0^{\theta} f(x) \; dx$. Then we can define a probability density, parameterized by $\theta$, by $p̣_{\theta}(x) = c(\theta) f(x) I(0\le x \le \theta)$ where $I(x)$ denotes the indicator function of its argument.

Suppose $x_1, \dots, x_n$ is an iid sample from this density. Then the density of the sample can be written \begin{equation} p_{\theta}(x_1, \dots, x_n) = c(\theta)^n \prod_{i=1}^n f(x_i) \prod_{i=1}^n I(0\le x_i \le \theta) \end{equation} The last factor above can be seen to be $\begin{cases} =0 \text{ if } x_{(n)}>\theta \\ =1 \text{ if } x_{(n)} \le \theta \end{cases}$ and then the result follows from the factorization theorem.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ what does it mean when you said "the last factor"? Also, the ordered stat ${x}_{(n)}$ does not show up in the likelihood expression itself? $\endgroup$
    – user13985
    Commented Sep 11, 2012 at 3:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "The last factor" is $\prod_{i=1}^n I(0\le x_i \le \theta)$ which clearly is the same as $\prod_{i=1}^n I(0\le x_{(i)} \le \theta)$ so depends on the order statistics. The point is that the product is one only if all the $n$ factors are one, only if $x_{(n)} \le \theta$. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 11, 2012 at 3:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Good answer, kjetil. If it is still confusing, try this. Using a different notation for the indicators, write the density as $f_\theta(x_i)=c(\theta)f(x_i)I_{[0,\theta]}(x_i)$. Now, observe that $I_{[0,\theta]}(x_i)=I_{[x_i,\infty)}(\theta)$. So, the joint density is $f_\theta(x)=[c(\theta)]^n\prod_{i=1}^n \left(f(x_i)I_[x_i,\infty)(\theta)\right)$. But the products of indicators is the indicator of the intersection, so $\prod_{i=1}^n I_[x_i,\infty)(\theta)=I_{\cap_{i=1}^n[x_i,\infty)}(\theta)$. And it is clear that $\cap_{i=1}^n[x_i,\infty)=[x_{(n)},\infty)$. $\endgroup$
    – Zen
    Commented Sep 11, 2012 at 4:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.