I have read a lot about why most statistical packages do not report the significance test results of random effects (e.g. here) Is there any publication about this precise topic that I could use to cite this in my paper?

up vote 1 down vote accepted

To my knowledge, the most thorough discussion of this is Doug Bates' mailing list post from quite a while ago. There's a nice summary of this on the GLMM faq: https://bbolker.github.io/mixedmodels-misc/glmmFAQ.html#why-doesnt-lme4-display-denominator-degrees-of-freedomp-values-what-other-options-do-i-have

It largely boils down to no one knowing quite how to calculate how many parameters are in these kinds of models. If you don't know how many parameters there are, then you also can't calculate a degrees of freedom, and hence, can't get a p-value.

If you need something to cite, there's a Bolker et al paper in Trends in Ecology and Evolution you could cite:

http://www.poulsenlabduke.com/uploads/1/9/3/6/19363955/bolker_et_al._2009_tree.pdf

Your Answer

 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.