11
$\begingroup$

I start with two Beta distributions:

$$\mathrm{Beta_A}(p; \alpha_A, \beta_A) = \frac{p^{\alpha_A-1}\,(1-p)^{\beta_A-1}}{\mathrm{B}(\alpha_A, \beta_A)}$$

$$\mathrm{Beta_B}(p; \alpha_B, \beta_B) = \frac{p^{\alpha_B-1}\,(1-p)^{\beta_B-1}}{{\mathrm{B}(\alpha_B, \beta_B)}}$$

where in the context of Bernoulli trials, $\alpha$ can be interpreted as $1 + \mathrm{successes}$ and $\beta$ can be interpreted as $1 + \mathrm{fails}$. $\mathrm{B}$ is the Beta function.

I then define the 'difference' between $\mathrm{Beta_A}$ and $\mathrm{Beta_B}$ as:

$$F(x; \alpha_A, \beta_A, \alpha_B, \beta_B) = \mathrm{Beta_A}(p) - \mathrm{Beta_B}(p)$$

Questions

  • what is the PDF of $F(x)$?
  • what family of probability density distributions does $F(x)$ belong to?

Example and illustration

For example for $\alpha_A=3, \beta_A=9$ (2 successes from 8 Bernoulli trials) and $\alpha_A=1, \beta_A=5$ (0 successes from 4 Bernoulli trials) the distribution of values that $p$ can take is:

Beta_A and Beta_B

If I then take $n$ random values $X_A \sim \mathrm{Beta_A}$ and $X_B \sim \mathrm{Beta_B}$, and find the differences between each $i^\mathrm{th}$ element, $X_{A,i} - X_{B,i}$, and plot these $n$ differences in a histogram, I am essentially sampling $F(x)$ - the underlying distribution of $\mathrm{Beta_A} - \mathrm{Beta_B}$ which can only be defined for $x \in [-1,+1]$.

With $n = 5 \times 10^7$ random samples and bin widths of $\Delta x = 0.004$, $F(x)$ takes the following form:

Histogram of sampled differences

What is the PDF of $F(x)$?


Notes

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you mean a convolution? math.la.asu.edu/~jtaylor/teaching/Fall2010/STP421/lectures/… $\endgroup$
    – Dave
    Commented Nov 14, 2019 at 12:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I guess I meant to follow the logic of the derivation but applied to subtraction instead of addition. I don’t think there would be that bound on $x$, though working through the calculus should reveal if there is. $\endgroup$
    – Dave
    Commented Nov 14, 2019 at 13:15
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The notations are awfully confusing, as they make $F(x)$ look like the difference of two Beta densities. Furthermore, $x$ and $p$ are not explicitly related. $\endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    Commented Nov 14, 2019 at 13:19
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There is an answer on maths.stackexchange. $\endgroup$
    – Xi'an
    Commented Nov 14, 2019 at 13:20
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Here are some papers also. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 14, 2019 at 13:39

1 Answer 1

14
$\begingroup$

I know this is a bit of an old question but for what it's worth there is an established closed-form solution to this problem, found by Pham-Gia, Turkkan, and Eng in 1993. It's a piecewise solution that relies on the Appell F1 hypergeometric function. Given $$ \begin{align} \theta_1 &= \text{beta}(\alpha_1, \beta_1) \\ \theta_2 &= \text{beta}(\alpha_2, \beta_2) \\ \theta_d &= \theta_0 - \theta_1 \end{align} $$

Then the probability of the difference of $\theta_d$ is piecewise over $\theta_d$. I've re-written it here, in case you can't access the paper. I'm using $\cdot$ to indicate multiplication when I need to break the equation over several lines.

Given $A = \text{Beta}(\alpha_1, \beta_1)\text{Beta}(\alpha_2, \beta_2)$.

For $-1 \leq \theta_d < 0$: $$ \begin{align} p(\theta_d) = &\text{Beta}(\alpha_2, \beta_1)\theta_d^{\beta_1 + \beta_2 - 1}(1 - \theta_d)^{\alpha_2 + \beta_1 - 1} \\ &\cdot F_1(\beta_1, \alpha_1 + \beta_1 + \alpha_2 + \beta_2 - 2, 1 - \alpha_1; \beta_1 + \alpha_2; 1 - \theta_d, 1 - \theta_d^2) \\ &/ A \end{align} $$

For $0 < \theta_d \leq 1$:

$$ \begin{align} p(\theta_d) = &\text{Beta}(\alpha_1, \beta_2)\theta_d^{\beta_1 + \beta_2 - 1}(1 - \theta_d)^{\alpha_1 + \beta_2 - 1} \\ &\cdot F_1(\beta_2, 1 - \alpha_2, \alpha_1 + \beta_1 + \alpha_2 + \beta_2 - 2; \alpha_1 + \beta_2; 1 - \theta_d^2, 1 + \theta_d) \\ &/ A \end{align} $$

And for $\theta_d = 0$, $\alpha_1 + \alpha_2 > 1$, $\beta_1 + \beta_2 > 1$: $$ p(\theta_d) = \text{Beta}(\alpha_1 + \alpha_2 - 1, \beta_1 + \beta_2 -1) / A $$

As for the family of this distribution, I'm honestly not sure. Somebody else may be able to jump in there.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.