3
$\begingroup$

Consider model 1 and model 2 where the former is a special case of the latter. E.g. model 1 is $y=\beta_0+\beta_1 x+u$ while model 2 is $y=\gamma_0+\gamma_1 x+\gamma_2 x^2+v$. Suppose model 1 is the true data generating process. What is the bias (as in bias-variance decomposition) of model 2?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The bias of model 2 at a particular point $x_0$ is the difference between the expectation (taken over the distribution of the error term) of the fitted value and the deterministic part of $y_0$: $$ \text{Bias}(x_0) = (\mathbb{E}[\hat\gamma_0+\hat\gamma_1 x_0+\hat\gamma_2 x_0^2]) - (\beta_0+\beta_1 x_0). $$ It will be zero if the estimators of $\gamma$s are all unbiased, yielding $\mathbb{E}(\hat\gamma_0,\hat\gamma_1,\hat\gamma_2)=(\beta_0,\beta_1,0)$. This would be the case e.g. for OLS estimators under a classical set of assumptions. This would generally not be the case e.g. for LASSO or ridge estimators -- though it is technically possible that $x_0$ happens to be a point where the biases of $\hat\gamma_1^{LASSO}x_0$ and $\hat\gamma_2^{LASSO}x_0^2$ (or ridge) cancel out.
A closely related thread is "Bias-variance trade-off in case of biased estimators: is the bias zero?".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.