Let $p$ be the chance of $X$ winning a point. Fix $N \ge 1$ and for $i$ any integer between $-N$ and $N$ define $f(i)$ to be the chance of $X$ winning the game given $X$ is $i$ points ahead of $Y.$
The rules imply $f(-N)=0,$ $f(N)=1,$ and otherwise the two possible outcomes at this stage, where $X$ will be $i+1$ points ahead with probability $p$ or $i-1$ points ahead with probability $1-p,$ imply
$$f(i) = p f(i+1) + (1-p) f(i-1).\tag{*}$$
This looks very much like the recursion in Pascal's triangle, so we might hope to find some kind of exponential expression for $f(i)$ of the form $f(i) = \alpha x^i$ for some fixed number $x$ (that depends only on $p$ and $N$). Because $f(-N)=0$ this isn't possible, but if we were to add some constant $\beta$ (which clearly satisfies the recursion $(*)$), we might be successful. The conditions imposed thereby on $x,$ $\alpha,$ and $\beta$ are
$$\begin{aligned}
0 &= f(-N) = \beta + \alpha x^{-N}\\
1 &= f(N) = \beta + \alpha x^N\\
\beta + \alpha x^i &= f(i) = p(\beta+\alpha x^{i+1})+(1-p)(\beta+\alpha x^{i-1})
\end{aligned}$$
Subtracting $\beta$ and dividing the third equation by $\alpha x^i$ gives
$$1 = px + (1-p)x^{-1},$$
equivalent to a quadratic equation in $x$ with solutions
$$x = \frac{1}{2p}\left(1 \pm \sqrt{1 - 4p(1-p)}\right).$$
(This is remarkable because $x$ depends only on $p,$ not on $N:$ given the relative strengths of the players, it's a universal value for all $N.$)
Now the first two equations yield
$$1 - 0 = (\beta + \alpha x^N) - (\beta + \alpha x^{-N}) = \alpha (x^N-x^{-N}),$$
implying
$$\alpha = \frac{1}{x^N - x^{-N}}$$
provided $x \ne 1/x,$ which happens when $p=1/2.$
Finally, the first equation states
$$0 = \beta + \alpha x^{-N} = \beta + \frac{x^{-N}}{x^N - x^{-N}},$$
simplifying to
$$\beta = -\frac{x^{-N}}{x^N - x^{-N}}.$$
Because we found a solution, this method works. It says
$$f(i) = \beta + \alpha x^i = \frac{x^i - x^{-N} }{x^N - x^{-N}}.$$
Finally, the question asks for the chance of winning when the situation is equal; that is, $i=0:$
$$f(0) = \frac{1 -x^{-N} }{x^N - x^{-N}} = \frac{x^N - 1}{x^{2N} - 1} = \frac{1}{x^N + 1} = \frac{(2p)^N}{\left(1 + \sqrt{1 \pm 4p(1-p)}\right)^N + (2p)^N}.$$
When $p\gt 1/2$ this value ought to exceed $1/2,$ because the advantage is to $X,$ and so we must take the negative sign in the formula. When $p\lt 1/2,$ take the positive sign. Finally, when $p=1/2,$ the recursion $(*)$ is easy to solve by inspection: the $f(i)$ must progress arithmetically from $0=f(-N)$ to $1=f(N),$ whence
$$f(i) = \frac{i+N}{2N}$$
for $p=1/2.$ (You could also obtain this solution by taking the limit of $f(i)$ as $x\to 1$ using L'Hopital's Rule.)
As an example, this plot shows how $X$'s chances to win with $N=4$ vary with $p:$
The curves must rise as $i$ increases, so the bottom red curve plots the chances for $i=-3$ and the top blue curve plots the chances for $i=3.$ The central black curve plots $f(0).$
The R
code to do the calculations and make this plot follows.
f <- Vectorize(function(i, p, n) {
if (abs(p - 1/2) <= 1e-8) (i + n) / (2 * n) else {
x <- (1 + ifelse(p > 1/2, -1, 1) * sqrt(1 - 4 * p * (1-p))) / (2 * p)
(x^i - x^(-n)) / (x^n - x^(-n))
}
})
N <- 4
curve(f(0, x, N), 0, 1, ylim = 0:1, n = 501,
main = bquote(paste("Chance to Win by ", .(N), " for ", i==.(1-N), " to ", .(N-1))),
xlab = "p", ylab = "Probability", lwd = 2)
for (i in setdiff(seq(-N+1, N-1), 0)) {
curve(f(i, x, N), add = TRUE, lwd = 2, col = hsv((i+N)/(2*N) * 0.75, .9, .8), n = 501)
}