Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options answers only not deleted user 39630

DAG stands for Directed Acyclic Graph. DAGs are commonly used to help people think about causal patterns amongst variables.

5 votes

DAGs and all models are wrong motto, what's the implication?

So the first thing I would point out is that DAGs, as models, have no special status under the "all models are wrong" motto---if you don't write down the implied DAG of your model, your model will still …
Carlos Cinelli's user avatar
5 votes

What justifies adjusting for proxy variables in the DAG causal inference framework?

Exact point identification is not possible here, but adjusting for Spend_in_Prev_Year does partially block the backdoor path, so that would be the rationale for it. As a general advice, you should ad …
Carlos Cinelli's user avatar
10 votes

Causality: Structural Causal Model and DAG

Your model statement specifies a class of DAGs, not a single DAG. … with the error term with $x_2$, but note in this DAG the causal effect of $x_1$ is still identified): …
Carlos Cinelli's user avatar
7 votes

Is it appropriate to use "time" as a causal variable in a DAG?

Whether "time" is an appropriate variable in a model depends on the phenomenon you are modeling. Thus, as you posed it, your question is about model misspecification, not a fundamental question about …
Carlos Cinelli's user avatar
15 votes

Can an instrumental variable equation be written as a directed acyclic graph (DAG)?

The basic IV dag is usually represented as: Where $U$ is unobserved and $Z$ is an instrument for the effect of $X$ on $Y$. … ; $S$ d-separates $Y$ from $Z$, in the DAG where the arrow $X\rightarrow Y$ is removed. …
Carlos Cinelli's user avatar
4 votes

Is this actually an example of selection bias?

Notice that even if the DAG were only $A \rightarrow Y \rightarrow C$ the post-interventional distribution $P(Y|do(A))$ is not non-parametrically identified, since $P(Y|do(A)) = P(Y|A) \neq P(Y|A, C)$ …
Carlos Cinelli's user avatar
23 votes
Accepted

Causal effect by back-door and front-door adjustments

When we intervene on $X$, this means the parents of $X$ do not affect its value anymore, which corresponds to removing the arrows pointing to $X$.So let's represent this intervention on a new DAG. … It suffices to show that in your DAG: $$ \sum_{X'}P(Y|Z, X') P(X') = \sum_{U}P(Y|Z, U) P(U) $$ Notice the DAG implies $Y \perp X|U, Z$ and $U \perp Z|X$ then: $$ \begin{aligned} \sum_{X'}P(Y|Z, X') …
Carlos Cinelli's user avatar
8 votes
Accepted

Representation of unconfoundedness of Rubin causal models on Pearl causal models

Yes, you can represent them in a DAG. In the structural framework, the DAG is nothing but a visual representation of the functional arguments that enter the structural equations. … You can thus write the DAG of the variables $T$, $X$ and $Y(1)$ as: In this DAG you can read that $Y(1) \perp\!\!\!\perp T \mid X$. …
Carlos Cinelli's user avatar
46 votes
Accepted

Does statistical independence mean lack of causation?

So if that's the case, does statistical independence automatically mean lack of causation? No, and here's a simple counter example with a multivariate normal, set.seed(100) n <- 1e6 a <- 0.2 b …
Carlos Cinelli's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Path Analysis in the Presence of a Conditioned-Upon Collider

Let the variables be stardadized to unit variance and let's use $\sigma_{ab}$ to denote the covariance of $A$ and $B$. You want the correlation of $A$ and $C$ when conditioning on the collider $B$. T …
Carlos Cinelli's user avatar
11 votes
Accepted

Do-Calculus for Causal Diagram 7.5 from "The Book of Why" (napkin problem)

I answered this once on twitter, I can reproduce the answer here. Derivation (graphs licensing each step are provided below). $$ \begin{align} P(y|do(x)) &= P(y|do(x), do(z)) \qquad &\text{Rule …
Carlos Cinelli's user avatar